Page 53 - Bank Case Studies
P. 53

“Benjamin Lawsky, the head of the Department of

                              Financial Services (DFS), ….said: “Put simply, Barclays
                              employees helped rig the foreign exchange market. They

                              engaged in a brazen ‘heads I win, tails you lose’ scheme to

                              rip off their clients.”’ (1)

               Whilst US attorney general Loretta Lynch said:


                              "They acted as partners – rather than competitors – in an

                              effort to push the exchange rate in directions favorable to
                              their banks but detrimental to many others," she said,

                              using "coded language to conceal their collusion". (2)

               The four US regulators and the FCA levied $5.7bn in fines directly for

               manipulating foreign exchange benchmarks. Additionally, UBS and

               Barclays were ordered to pay $263m to the Department of Justice
               because their activity violated agreements signed when the banks

               were fined for Libor rigging.


               Despite these huge fines, which took the combined penalties for
               foreign exchange manipulation to $10bn, shares in the banks surged

               on investors’ relief that they were not larger. Barclays had set aside
               £2 billion in relation to the investigations but was not judged to have

               breached a deferred prosecution agreement with the Department of

               Justice (DoJ).

               Barclays has agreed to pay a combined total of £1,534 million

               (sterling equivalent).  In common with other financial institutions

               announcing FX settlements today with the DOJ, Barclays has also
               agreed to plead guilty to a violation of US anti-trust law.
   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58