Page 346 - The Case Lab Book
P. 346

2.  Do you agree that what the CEO did to regain control was correct?

                   3.  What would you have done under the circumstances?

               PARAGRAPH 1

                   The Business Communications Group (BCG) had, in its fifteen years of existence, established for itself a
               dominant position in a number of global markets. The credit for its success lay at the feet of one man, its
               founder; Chairman; and Chief Executive, Richard Sweet. Sweet had developed the company on the basis of
               planned introduction of new products supported by imaginative marketing, and good customer service the BCG
               achieved an annual turnover in excess of £2 billion. With its high profit margins, and continually rising share
               prices, it had rapidly become one of the favourites of investors. However, it had recently become apparent to
               the chief executive that the organization structure, no longer fitted the company's strategy.

                   Normally the class will readily generate the strengths of BCG: new products, imaginative marketing and
               customer service which in combination make it a market leader (Board 2). In addition it will normally be
               picked up that there is a weakness, a problem with the company structure.
                   However, it is at this point that a more visual and visceral analysis of the information may be made by
               using the chalk board to spell out the linkages and causal factors that might be at play in the paragraph as
               shown in Boards 2, 3, 4 and 5.

                   Board 3 shows the relationship of high profit margins, rising stock prices and sales. Examination of the
               product life cycles, as plotted to show the profit momentum line, allows a clearer interpretation of the core
               competences of BCG to emerge. Essentially, BCG has created both a potential technological gap and
               barrier to entry. From these it may be drawn out that BCG is perceived as a good investment and that
               management is also perceived as good.
                   Board  3  also  shows  the  profit  momentum  line  that  may  be  implied  from  the  statement  ‘planned
               introduction of new products’. As product ‘A’ reaches maturity a new product ‘B’ is introduced to take-up
               the profit short-fall and so on thereby maintaining the up-ward trend in sales and profit growth.  It might also
               be  argued that the same logic could  be applied to geographic introduction of the  product line (market
               extension  1,  2,  3)  where  new  markets  (Europe,  China  etc.)  allow  product  extension  driving  the  profit
               momentum line up (profit momentum b)  – Board 4.


                   Board 4 gives a visual interpretation of management’s contribution to financial performance of BCG.
               Moreover, it may be drawn out that the market value of its shares is built upon a combination of the intrinsic
               value  of  its  assets  etc.  and  the  performance  of  its  management.  However,  a  further  question  on  the
               implications of the chairman and chief executive being one in the same person may be also be asked and
               measured against the normal roles of each – chairman runs the board and the CEO develops the strategy
               - a strength or a potential weakness?

                   Asking  the  class  what  the  company  is  selling  (Board  5),  whether  a  product  or  a  package,  helps  to
               consolidate the inter-relatedness of the elements embedded in the paragraph as well as the linkages that
               underpin them.


               PARAGRAPH 2


                   For years the company had been organized along functional lines, with directors in charge of finance,
               marketing, production, personnel, purchasing, engineering, and research and development.  In its growth, the
               company  had  expanded  its  product  lines  beyond  its  original  product  of  Network  Systems,  Satellite
               Communications Systems, Network applications.  However, concern had arisen that its organization structure
   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351