Page 189 - Flipping book The Adam Paradox Hypothesis - Second Edition.pdf

The Ādam Paradox Hypothesis 166
4. APH (Adamic Threshold Model)
Claim: The genome was long prepared. Around 70 ka, a threshold was crossed:
spirit, knowledge, and symbolic law were infused.
Strengths:
Explains archaeological silence and sudden symphony.
Explains genetic readiness and delayed ignition.
Explains anthropological scaling beyond biology.
Supported by probability math: random convergence impossible.
Resonates with Qur
ʾānic beacons describing infusion of names, spirit, and
trust.
Verdict: APH is the only model consistent with evidence.
Table 14.2 — Competing Models vs. APH
Synthesis: Collapse of World Opinion
When Harvard, Smithsonian, and NAS are examined critically, their models
collapse:
Demography explains growth after ignition, not before.
Gradualism is refuted by the silence of archaeology.
Gene sweeps are undermined by latency and mathematical improbability.
The Adamic threshold is therefore not one interpretation among many. It is the
only model left standing — a unification of archaeology, genetics, anthropology,
and probability under the beacon of revelation.