Page 204 - Flipping book The Adam Paradox Hypothesis - Second Edition.pdf

The Ādam Paradox Hypothesis 181
Beacon 3 — Spirit (Q 32:9)
“He breathed into him of His Spirit.
”
This describes a leap beyond naming: the infusion of imagination, creativity, and
myth-making. Archaeology shows this with sudden symbolic artifacts ~70kya:
ochre engravings at Blombos, bead ornaments, and structured burials.
Scientific Proxy: These enduring symbols point to regulatory activation of
higher-order cortical regions, such as HAR1 in brain development.
Mathematical Clarity:
Bayesian modeling of artifact distributions gives us posterior odds. If
cognition were gradual, the probability of seeing a sharp artifact burst
~70kya is very low. Yet models show odds >10:1 in favor of a punctuated
ignition (d’Errico & Banks, 2013).
This infusion of “spirit” is not vague theology—it aligns with measurable
discontinuities in material culture.
Mathematical Clarity Made Simple
Scientists use math to test different ideas about how human thinking developed.
One way is by looking at artifacts(things people left behind, like carvings, beads,
and burials).
If human intelligence grew slowly and gradually, we would expect to find a
steady trickle of symbolic artifacts spread evenly over time.
But what we actually see is a sudden burst of symbolic artifacts around
70,000 years ago — like someone flipped a switch.
Using a method called Bayesian modeling (a kind of probability math),
researchers calculated the odds. The results show it’s more than 10 times more
likely that human creativity appeared suddenly, not gradually.
So in simple terms:
The math strongly supports the idea of a big leap in human imagination around 70,000 years
ago — not just a slow climb.