Page 526 - 2024 Orientation Manual

lawsuit challenging the bar’s expenditures, including an award of attorneys’ fees to

the prevailing plaintiff. 37
The Court in Popejoy said that "even if a given activity possesses

communicative content of a political or ideological nature, it may nevertheless be

reasonably related to the practice of law, to the regulation of the legal system, or to

the improvement of legal services." Indeed, under Keller guidelines "compulsory

financial support of some activities with at least a modicum of ideological content

is inevitable." 38

In 1998, a Florida lawyer petitioned to enjoin the state bar and its directors,

officers, employees, and agents from engaging in lobbying and legislative

activities. He asserted that the Bar provided administrative support to a private,

non-profit organization called Florida Lawyers Association for the Maintenance of

Excellence, Inc. 39 In Florida Bar v. Schwarz, the Supreme Court of Florida held

that neither the state bar’s contracting to provide services to the lawyers

association nor state bar officers’ participation in the voluntary association violated

laws pertaining to use of compulsory bar dues on lobbying for legislative

activities. 40 In this situation, the members ’ contributions were voluntary, the bar

exercised no dominion or control over association’s activities, and the association

regularly reimbursed bar for expenses incurred in providing personnel and support

to it. 41

37 See Id. at 1429-32.
38 887 F.Supp. at 1428.
39 See Florida Bar v. Schwarz, 708 So.2d 589 (Fla. 1998).
40 See Id. at 590.
41 See Id.

Page 11 of 15