Page 3 - Nellis Creech NTTR Bullseye July 1 2016
P. 3
BULLSEYE News 3July 1, 2016
www.aerotechnews.com/nellisafb Facebook.com/NellisBullseye
Weapons Instructor Course Class 16A
Feb. 1-June 25, 2016 7. Capt. Caleb J. Pletts 2. Capt. David G. Billeci 4. Capt. Christopher J. Freed
8 WPS (ABM) NELLIS AFB, Nevada 16 WPS (F-16) NELLIS AFB, Nevada 3. Capt. Martin A. Caluag 5. Capt. Robert S. Hegler
1. Capt. Jesus M. Burciaga Jr. 1. Maj. Jesse M. Proctor 4. Capt. Alissa L. Comerford
2. Capt. Craig S. Harms 2. Capt. James B. Byrd 5. Capt. Austin T. Davis 6. Capt. Laura K. Martineau
3. Capt. Eric S. Haupt 3. Capt. Michael E. Conrad 7. Capt. Jason L. Riggs
4. Capt. Peter L. Hickman 4. Capt. Andrew R. Davis 6. Capt. Keith M. DeAgostine 8. Capt. Jonathan R. Vanpinxteren
5. Capt. Aaron E. Ho 5. Capt. Daniel J. Duncan 7. Capt. Jeremiah A. Deibler
6. Capt. Brian D. Hucks 6. Capt. Eric R. Emerson 8. Capt. Joseph J. Mellone 9. Capt. Luke W. Wascovich
7. Capt. Taylor C. Jones 7. Capt. Eric D. Kitaif 9. Capt. Alexander X. Milhous 10. Capt. Brendan K. Wier
(EC-130) 8. Capt. Christopher S. Martin 10. Capt. Marlene Rivera 11. Capt. Richard S. Win eld
8. Capt. Jacob A. Jordan 9. Capt. William S. Parks 11. Capt. Francisco J. Torres
(RC-135) 10. Capt. John C. Powers 34 WPS (HH-60) NELLIS AFB, Ne-
9. Maj. Shaun M. Herr 11. Capt. Luke E. Weyhmuller 26 WPS (MQ-9) NELLIS AFB, Nevada vada
10. Capt. Brian M. Mostek 17 WPS (F-15E) NELLIS AFB, Nevada 1. Maj. Seth C. Anderson 1. Capt. William T. Meisenzahl
14 WPS (AC-130) (HURLBURT FLD, 1. Capt. George A. Arbuckle 2. Capt. Douglas J. Kottraba III 2. Capt. omas E. Steiner
2. Capt. Bryant K. Baum 3. Capt. James A. Carfagno 3. Capt. John R. Tucciarone III
Florida) 3. Capt. Andrew R. Gri n 4. Capt. Michael G. Dunn 4. Capt. Ryan M. Wiese
1. Capt. John D. Barringer (MC-130) 4. Capt. Michael W. Shea 5. Capt. Drew T. Larned
2. Maj. Ryan R. Taylor 5. Capt. Travis J. Slack 6. Capt. Daniel M. Reineke 57 WPS (C-17) (MCGUIRE AFB, New
3. Capt. Jason W. Loveless 19 WPS (IWIC) NELLIS AFB, Nevada 29 WPS (C-130) (LITTLE ROCK, Jersey)
4. Capt. Logan Marcucci (U-28) 1. Capt. Chelsea J. Agee
5. Capt. Alexander E. Biegalski Arkansas) 1. Maj. James C. McCormick
6. Capt. James J. Kellenbence 1. Maj. Nick W. Biggs 2. Maj. Nicole M. Stenstad
2. Maj. Joshua A. Nemitz 3. Capt. Kevin W. Brooks
4. Capt. Matthew S. Lund
____________ See CLASS 16A, on page 5
3. Maj. Robert A. Sloan II
RPA, from page 1 ______________ same time the 556th Test and Evaluation TTPs in support of airborne RPA ight ning to do both they gain an expert in
to train towards mitigating potential Squadron was testing how to ght against operations in the Nevada Test and Train- the squadron.”
signal interruptions. RPA ECOs integrate SATCOM contested threats. I was just at ing Range.
with the a ected MQ-1/9 aircrews, the the right place at the right time.” Being one of only a handful of trained
relay site, space command, and others “One student will sit in the seat and ECOs is something the only fully cer-
at the Air Operations Center (AOC) to Since Air Force regulations dictate experience what it’s like to receive a jam- tified Air Force RPA ECO is set on
mitigate these signal interruptions. that every wing or squadron Weapons ming signal while ying another student changing.
and Tactics o ce will have graduated acts as the ‘ECO’ and supports the pilot
“I had this vision back in 2013, when I and certi ed Electronic Combat Pilots who has received the threat,” said Craig. “I’m the only RPA ECO in the Air
wrote the syllabus for the rst time,” said (ECPs), Electronic Warfare Officers “ ey swap roles and do it all over again so Force community, meaning I don’t have
Craig. “I didn’t think it would end up (EWOs) or ECOs, the demand for a cer- they both get to experience those perspec- other ECOs that I can go to and ask
turning into an actual ACC [Air Combat ti ed ECO course for MQ-1 and MQ-9 tives, from both the pilot and the ECO.” questions,” said Craig. “Since we only
Command] course.” squadrons grew. have one dedicated instructor, myself,
In addition, students received help the ratio is one to four. ere will be
Craig, who previously served as a For- “ ey [Air Force Central Command] from the 26th Space Aggressors Squad- four students, four times a year and as
malized Training Unit (FTU) Instructor are in the demand phase for informa- ron from Schriever AFB, Colo., who we continue to train ECOs we will grow
at Holloman Air Force Base, New Mex- tion,” said Craig. “ ey want to learn replicate enemy threats to space-based in size until we have two-to-three ECOs
ico, was deemed the most knowledge- what the RPA capabilities are. Leader- and space-enabled systems during tests in every unit.”
able about the satellite communications ship’s mindset of the Predator and Reap- and training exercises.
(SATCOM) threats and how to combat er’s capabilities in a non-permissive ght The course, which was conducted
them. He spent the next three years lay- are shi ing now that we have proven new “Getting to interact with the Aggres- jointly between Creech and Nellis AFBs,
ing the groundwork for the course. innovative solutions.” sors was incredible,” said Joseph. “We recently graduated a beta class of ve
learned about friendly and adversary Airmen assigned to the 432nd WG.
Armed with the knowledge of a man- Much like Sun Tzu alluded to, we must capabilities and mindsets, challenges and
ning shortage, Craig developed new mitigate our own weaknesses before they weaknesses. is program is about pre- Although the training currently
tactics, techniques and procedures that can be exploited by the enemy, which is paring for a more advanced adversary, so focuses on officers, enlisted Airmen
would allow the current manning to act why the newly created ECO course is it’s important to train against the best.” in RPA career elds may also attend a
in dual hatted position thus reducing the designed to be a three phase system and modi ed ECO course prior to deploy-
risks RPAs are subject to. walks the students through 15 days of By using GPS and SATCOM jamming ments.
rigorous training. techniques, the 26th WPS provides the
A er taking the course Airmen will Air Force, joint and coalition military In a time when Airmen are asked to
return to their units as trained experts on “ e course o ered realistic training personnel with an understanding of how nd vulnerabilities, develop a course of
RPA use of the electromagnetic spectrum and challenging missions,” said Maj. to recognize, mitigate, counter and defeat action and implement change to miti-
(EMS) to include, but not limited to: area Joseph, ECO student. “It would do us these threats. gate threats through innovation, Craig
of operation (AO) non-kinetic threats, no good to practice in “theory” without o ers one nal piece of advice.
radio communications, GPS, remote- real-world, realistic training scenarios Still developing Airmen with the skills
split operations (RSO), SATCOM, and that will mirror future/present threats needed to win today’s ght and prepare “We are definitely preparing for
Link 16 a tactical data exchange network that we may face.” for tomorrow’s threats without directly tomorrow’s ght through innovation,
(JTIDS). engaging the enemy doesn’t come with- 100 percent,” said Craig. “I’d say to
e rst phase begins with the aca- out its own challenges. other Airmen not to give up on their
“It came to a point where I felt that we demics portion of the course and teaches innovation. Be persistent, perfect your
will no longer be ghting in a permissive students to plan and prepare against a “One of the misconceptions we have theory, and get it to the right people with
war and it couldn’t just be me that knows jamming threat. is that, we’re already critically manned,” in uence who will be able to help you
how to ght against it, so I dra ed up a said Craig. “We can’t divvy out any more in developing that innovation. I’ve had
syllabus on how I would train an ECO Next the students learn to integrate bodies to be only ECOs, or deploy them tremendous support from the 26 WPS
to fight a threat,” said Craig. “At the RPAs into the SATCOM during simu- to be a part of this ght at the relay site. cadre, USAFWC, 432d AEW, and ACC
lated ights, followed by the nal hands- to get this course where it is today; I
on portion in which students execute e truth is, units don’t lose a pilot or an wouldn’t have been able to do it alone.”
instructor, but using the current man-