Page 92 - RICHERT VS. SORKIN THEFT OF THE AMERICAN PRESIDENT AND THE WEST WING

its decision that two separately developed projects had merged and extinguished Richert and Morris's right to an irreducible story by credit.
And no determination regarding a merged project can de decided without at least one expert reader or three expert readers reading all of the written material.
From the attached Ferguson v. Writers Guild of America, West:
The scope ofjudicial review in a particular case, then, is limited to a determination whether there has heen a materinl breach af the terms of the credits manual, which binds the Writers Guild as well as its members.
Judicial review of the Writers Guild's credits determination is restricted to considering whether the party challenging the d.eterminution has demonstrated a material and prejudicial departure from the procedures specified in the credits manual.g
BASED ON THESE NEW REVELATIONS AND FACTS, WILLIAM RICHERT AND KYLE MORRIS ARE DEMANDING THAT THE WGA AND AARON SORKIN AND ALAN HORN AND ROBERT REDFORD AND REINER RETRACT THE ILLEGAL CREDIT AWARD AND GIVE THE PROPER CREDIT EARNED BY THE TRUE CREATORS OF "THE AMERICAN PRESIDENT" AND "THE WEST WING"