Page 16 - RICHERT V. WGA - JUDGE WEST JAN 10 2010

IN'ERESTS
1 ACCRUED, THERE'S ADI.III,II STRATIVE FEES. I..lE }IAVE

2 PRESU}IPTION AD}'I NISTRATIOI{ I,}I
FEE OF TEN PERCEIIT. I,IOt,l,

3 SAYII{G THAT'S AT THE TIfiE oF SETTLEITENT. $E'RE
FoUR YEARS

4
OUT; THINGS C0UL0 CHANGE; AllD THE REASONABLE oF THAT

5 I'I,I I IT
SETTLE}IENT. NOT SURE READ EXACTLY AS LIKE

6 tIR. SCHECTER DOES. 8UT THAT'S A
PRESUTIPTIVELY APPROPRIATE

7 FEE; BUT, YoU KNol.,, lvE CAN LOoK AT THOSE THritGS, |tl
AND
I
-.
WILLING TO

TIR.
9 JOHNSON1 THAT'S WNAT l\lE WAI{T To LooK AT.

10
CAN I.IR,
JASKO JUST ADDRESS THIS ISSUE IN

11 PARTICULAR, YOUR HONOR?

R. ..
12 SCHECTER; YOUR HOiIOR

13 I'lR. : IT' S tty
JoHl,lSoN TURi{ .

14
l4R. SCHECTER: WELL, I,tt GoING
TO oBJECT, THAT,S
ALL,
}IR. JASKO DOESN'T HAVE ANYTHING BEFORE THE
COURT,
l6
YOU IIERELY WERE PROVIDED WITH HEARSAY COI,II.IENTS
FROI.|
'17 R.
COUNSEL REPORTING TO YOU WHAT JASKO OR HTAT

18 }IR. GERBAIS SAID.

19
iIR. JASKO HAS NO ROLE II{ THE D.G.A.
CASE, SO
IT
20 WOULD BE INAPPROPRIATE FOR HI}t, ON THIS RECORD,
TO
PROVIDE CO}IIIENT. IF
21 COUNSEL, FILES A }IOTIOII. AS YOU

22 SUGGESTED, AND I4R, JASKO IN
PROVIDES TESTTIIONY THE FORIiI OF

23 A DECLARATIoN, YoU Ktiotr, tT WOULD BE A DIFFERE T
}|ATTER,
IT'S
24 8UT NOT REALLY APPROPRIATE FOR HII,I TO GIVE COIIIIENT.

25
I,IR. :
Is I,II
JOHNSO THIS EXACTLY WHAT TALKII{G

ABouTi A80UT HoW I BELTEV€TltE D.G.A. Is
TRYI G T0 EXPLoRE

27 THE PROPER IIIVESTIGATION INTO WHAT IS IIi
GOITTG ON

28
PARTICULAR SITUATION.

.
KENYNIA D. DARDEN, CSR