Page 18 - RICHERT V. WGA - JUDGE WEST JAN 10 2010

1 COURT.

2 T
AND }JHILE SAID THAT, YOU KIIOU, I WOT'I

3
REI.,RIIE THE AGREEIIENT, I.LL
CERTAINLY Ef{TERTAIN AND IIY

4
SUCCESSOR WILL ENTERTAIII IIOTIONS, IF
THAT'S NECESSARY. TO
IF
CLARIFY THERE'S COI,IPLIANCE OR IIOT COIIPLIANCE
AND
6 SUFFICIENT IS
IIIFORIIATION BEIiIG PROVIDED WHERE },E
CAN
7 DETERIIINE IF THERE IS
COTIPLIANCE.
I
..
TIIE GOAL AND I
AGREE WITH I.tR. JOHNSON TO
--
SOI.IE DEGREE THE UNDERLYING GOAL OF THIS
SETTLEIIE}IT AI{D
10 IHE COURT'S IT
DETERMII{ATION THAT t,iAS A FAIR AI{D

11 REASONABLE SETTLE}'EiIT OII
BEHALF OF THE CLASS OF PEOPLE
I.JI{O
12 WERE CERTIFIED FOR SETTLEIiIENT PURPOSES
AI{D WHO ARE
13 BENEFIfiING
FRoI,I THIS SETTLE},ENT: Is THAT THERE t{oulD
8E A
14
MORE TRANSPARENT
AND OPEN ACCOUNTING OF COLLECIIOHS
AND
15 EISTRIBUTIONS.

16 THAT'S A VERY, YOU KIIOW,
HIGH LEVEL
17
DESCRIPTION
OF WHAT I,dE'RE DOTNG HERE, BUT IT IiEEDS
SONE
18 BACKUP II{.ORDER IT,S
TO K!IO[,J BEING DOIIE. AfiID SO YOU
TELL
19 ME WHAT YOU WANT TO DO. IF
YOU THINK THAT YOq HAVE TOTAL
-- I
zo
DEFEI{SES DON'T NECESSARILY
AGREE WITH YOUR AI{ALYSIS
21
OF THE JURISDICTION OF THE COURT AND THE ABILITY
OF THE
22 COURT TO
OVERSEE AND CONTINUE TO I1ONITOR THE

23 I}'PLEI'EI'ITATIOII OF THE
JUDGIIENT THAI WAS ENTERED INTO THIS
I
24
CLASS ACTION. THIiIK THE
COURT HAS VERY BROAD
25 IN
JURISDICTION TERITS OF EI{FORCII{G A
CLASS.ACTTO
26 SETTLEIIENT
AND IIAKII.IG SURE IT,S CO}IPLIED WIT+I.

27
AI{D SO IF
YOU WANT TO HANG YOUR HAT ON THAT

28
ONE, YOU'LL PROBABLY BE HAPPY TIIAT I,II
LEAVING. AiID

g^Drr4pFNr-c-sR
p,on cdpwNE rp SFJ9NIi
.1 E ^