Page 28 - RICHERT V. WGA - JUDGE WEST JAN 10 2010

25

IIR. I'I'I IT
1 JOHNSON: JUST SAYII{G SHOULD HAVE BEEN

AS A COURSE. II'S
2 DONE IIATTER OF BEEI,I DONE, ET CETERA.
.
3 WE WILL I.IAKE A ITOTIO}I . I.'E DON'T THTNK - - TTIIS IS
UHAT
-- IF
4
WE'RE ASKING THIS IS BASICALLY I.'HAT hIE'RE ASKITIG

IS IS
FOR, THIS OUTLINED, THIS WIIAT HE'S SAYING, OVERALL,

TNAT I'}I ASKIIIG
6 FOR SO TIANY THINGS,

7 THE COURT: WELL, THERE,S DIFFERENT THINGS. IT

..
8 SOUIIDS LIKE WHAT YOU'RE ASKING FOR IN TER S OF SOhE

I
DISCLOSURE OR TRANSPARENCY AS TO THE CY PRES PAYIIENTS, NOT

OBJECTIONABLE,
10 AND THAT COULD BE WORKED OUT.

1't WHAT YOU'RE ASKING FOR IN TER}IS OF
I,IORE

12 DETAILED ACCOUNTTNG OF YEAR.BY.Y€AR COLLECTIONS VERSUS

IT
13 YEAR.BY.YEAR PAYOUTS, SOUNDS TO I'IE IIIGHT BE A LITTLE

14
. I T I'HAT IS. IT
I'IORE PROBLEI'IATIC DON ' KNOW BURDEN I1AY

I{OT BE THAT I.IUCH OF A BURDEN. I 'I,I SURE I,IE'LL WHAT tT
SEE
IS
16 IN RESPOI{DING IO YOUR }IOTION.

I
17 AND THINK THAT'S WHAT NEEDS TO BE DOiIE,

18 WE I{EED TO BRIEF IT. }IE IT.
NEED TO DOCU}IENT UE NEED TO

19 HAVE SO}IE DECLARATIONS I.,ITH SOI'IE FACTUAL BASIS Oli
WHICTJ TO

20
DETERI|INE WHETHFR, YES, THIS TS A REASONABLE AND LOGICAL

21 REOUEST ON BEHALF OF THE COUNSEL AND I,IOT A STG IFICANT OR

22 INAPPROPRIATE D.G.A.
BURDEN ON THE TO PROVIDE THI$

23 INFOR ATI0N; COtiSISTENT I{ITH THE INTENT AND
COITENT SpTRIT

24 OF THE AGREEI.IENT OR THE EXPRESSED TER}IS OF THE AGREEIIEI{T

25 OR WHETHER NO CLASS COUI{SEL IS ASKING FOR SO}IETHII{G TIIAT

WASI'I'T FOR. IT'S
26 BARGAINED COI{TRARY TO AND INCONSISTE}IT

27
WITH TIIE EXPRESSED TERI'S OF THE
AGREEI,IENT AND NOT

28
APPROPRIATE FOR THE COURT TO ORDER.

KENYNTA D. DARDEN, CSR