Page 29 - RICHERT V. WGA - JUDGE WEST JAN 10 2010

I'}I
I{OT PASSING OI{'IT,
ONE WAY OR THE OTHER.
I THINK
SITTTNG DOUN ArtlD SpE DING A FEl,
HOURS TOCETHER,
3 YOU OUGHI TO BE ABLE
TO WORK SOI1E OF THESE THII,IGS
OUT,
4
A0AIN; BUT yOU SPENT A LOT
OF TIME TRyINc TO WoRK TH T|G$
0UT;
HAVEN,T BEEN I/ORKED oUT, SO yOU coT IT pUT
NOl,, rT 0N
o A IIORE . I ,T
FORI,IALTZED SCHEDULE
DON
KI,IOW WHAT ELSE TO
7
TELI YOU.

[R.
SCHECTER; rF r JUST
CAN OTE THE FOLLOWIT{G,
o
Y0UR HONOR: ONE OF THE PROBLE S HE IS,
HAVE EVERY TIIiE l,lE
10 II'I
II,ITERACT WITH COUNSEL OR DO JUST FTLINGS,
THEY ASK US
11 SOIIETHINC DIFFERENT, I
FOR TIIE FIRST TTTE fiEARD
THE
12
ALLEGATIOI{ OF THE EXPENSES
ARE TOO HIGH.

HERETOFORE, IT }IAD BEEN
THERE WAS IIOT A
14 TMNSPARENCY
OF WHETHER THEY'RE REASONABLE,
THERE T,'AS I{O
15 POSITION TAKEN AS
TO W}IETHER THEY,RE TOO HIGH.
t6
THE cOuRTi UELL,
UNREAS0NABLE AIID.TOo HIGH IIAYSE
't7
INTERPRETED, IIORE OR LESS, AS THE
SATIE THIIIG"
18 R. rT
SCHECTER: t{AS A PROCESS, YOUR HONoR.
THE
19
PROCESS I.IAS WE DON'T .-
Kt{Oti AND THAT'S

20 f{R. JOHNSON; THAT,S
WHAT I,JE,RE SAyl[G.

21 HR. SCHECTFR: THAT,S ,{oT .-
WHAT
22 tiR. JoHIiSON:
LET IrE ttAKE IT CLEAR sO you

23 UI'IDERSIAIID IT. LET I'E IT
}IAKE CLEAR-

24
THE COURT; |rrAIT A [1 {UTE. yOU
Ki{Oli WHAT
25 tJE HAVE HERE?
WE HAVE A LTTTLE PERSOI{ALITY ISSUE,
THE TltfO OF YOU
26 DON'T
GET ALONG VERY WELL AND AREN,T REALLY
WORKIT{G WELL
27
TOGETHER,

28
MR. JOHNSON;
DON'T
WE ACCEPT THE LEGAL ISSUES.

p,10r .,, pw g^D^43gFU_c_s_R
E 7c ^"rFJ)jyMf
^,,7 ^