Page 35 - RICHERT V. WGA - JUDGE WEST JAN 10 2010

1
TIIAT'S sEEN OEVELOPED OVER AN TIIIE.
EXTENDED PERIOD OF
IT
TAKES $OI.IE TIIIE TO GET OVER. AI{D
SO

3 EITHER YOU'RE GOING TO THE INFORI,IATION OR YOU,RE NOT. IF

4 YOU DON'T GET IT, IS
YOUR DISTRUST GOING TO REI.IAII{.

5 YOU'RE GOING TO COI.IE II,ITO COURT. THE tS
COURT EITI{ER
IT IF
6 GOII{G TO ORDER IT'S APPROPRIATE, OR THEY'RE NOI

GOIIiG IT.
7
TO ORDER

8 I.IR. JOHNSOiI; YEAH.
THE NEXT ISSUE HAS TO DO UITI{
I
THE SUFFICIEIICY OF TNFORIIATION PROVIDED BY
THE CLASS
..
10
}1EI'lBER AI{D PAYI{ENTS HERE, HERE, IT HAS TO DO WIT}I

THEY'RE .-
11 GETTING IIONEY WE DON'T BELIEVE THERE'S ADEqUATE

12 STATE}IEIIT OF
FROI.I I{HAT TERRITORY, FROI' WHAT PERIOD OF

13 TIIIE. AND WHAT COLLECTION SOCIEry.

I
14
BELIEVE THE ARGUI4ENT OF S.A.G, IS
THAT,
15 I.'ELL, IT'S
DIFFICULT AT TIfiES TO DO THIS BECAUSE I{E GET

16 OUR STATE}.IENTS AT DIFFEREI{T TIUES
FROI1 WHEN }IE IIAY GET TI{E
I
17 IIONEY. THII'IK WHAT WE'RE sAYtNG Is:
.LooK, IF IT
HERE

18
CAN BE DOI{E WITHOUT A LOT OF HASSLE. THEN PROVIDE
WHAT YOU
19 CAN,
BUT WHY SHOULDN'T I,IEI,IBERS AIID NON.IIEIIBERS BE ALLOWED

20 TO SEE YOU'RE FINALLY .1970 --
GETTING PAID FROII 1994 FROII

2',1 SWEDEN AND FOR THIS TITLE. THAT'S ALL
WE'RE ASKING FOR.

22
WE BELIEVE THIS IS SOI.IETHING THAT IS STANDARD
OR SHOULD
23 BE, .-
AND SHOULD BE PROVIDED TO ALL

24 THE CoURT: r'lt
LooKING AT I,ty NoTES FROII

23
OCTOBER 26TH. THAT'S EXACTLY THE
SA}1E ISSUE WE HAD THEN.

26 THE FOLLOWIITIG ISSUES WERE To 8E ADDRESSED BY
THE PARTIES,
0F T!AT:
27 AND oNE THE|! wAs "THE PARTIES UILL HAVE

28
ADDRESSEO THE
SUFFICIENCY OF IiIFORIIATION PROVIDED TO CLASS

KENYNIA
D. DARDEN, CSR
PHOTOC:OoViNe nF fFa,lraF'Dr oo uo.;.^ -'