Page 36 - RICHERT V. WGA - JUDGE WEST JAN 10 2010

33

I'IEIIsERS WITH PAYI.TENTS HADE UNDER THE TER'IS OF
1 THE

2
SETTLEI,IENT AI,ID ADVISE THE COURT OF ANY DISPUTE COI{CERIIING

THE I{EED FOR ADDITIOi'IAL INFOR}IATION.'

4
DID
NOW, YOU IIAKE ANY PROGRESS ON THAT, OR

ARE WE IN THE EXACT SAIIE POSITION THAT I.iE BEFORE? I
HERE
UP. I
6 BROUGHT THAT PULLED IT OUT OF IIY NOTES FROI4 THE

26TH. I'I'I IT .- IT'S
7 NOT EVEN SURE WAS THAT TfIE JOINT

I
STATE}IENT THAT FILED IN
YOU WITH I\tE ADVANCE TO T}IIS
I
HEARIIIG, AND SO I KIND OF THOUGHT IT GONE. IT
WAS I1AY8E

10
},,ASN ' T.

WE. IT.S I
11
l.lR. $CHECTER: AS DID OT THERE. IT

lilAs RECEIVED BY PLAINTIFF'S IF I CAti
COUNSEL, BUT AKE A

SUGGESTION?

14 IN THE S.A.G. CASE, THERE IS A ROLE FOR

CONSULTANTS.
15 I,'E TRIED TO EXPLAIN TO COUNSEL AND

t6 CONSULTANTS, IN A IT
PRELII.III.{ARY WAY, THAT WOULO BE

17 BURDENSOI4E. THIS STRIKES IlE AS A KIND OF IqSUE
THAT

18 IDEALLY WILL BE RESOLVED }'ITH COLLOQUY BACK AND FORTH.

19
AND COUNSEL SHOULD RESERVE ITS POSITION.

20 AND IF
THE COTISULTAI{TS AREN'T SATISFIED THAT

21 $,E'VE EXPLAINED TO THE}1 WHY THE INFOR}IATIOII GIVE IS
WE THE

22 I,IAXI I.IUllI WE CAN REALLY GIVE }'ITHOUT A GREAT DEAL
OF

23
ADTIINISTRATIVE EURDEN, THEN THEY CAN Co E BAcK; BUT I

THINK I'R. A
JASKO AND GERBAY WILL HAVE CHAIICE TO HEAR

25 DIRECTLY FROII THE HORSE'S MOUTH, THE S,A,G.,
PEOPLE OF TIIE

2E THE PEOPLE TO ADIIIIIISTER THE PROGRAII, TO WHY ADDIIIG
THAT

27 KIND OF INFORI{ATIOII }JOULD BE PROBLEIIATIC, PROBLEI.IATIC I,IOT

28
FOR CONFIDEiITIALITY
REASONS, PROBLE}IATIC FOR COIIFIDEI{TIAI

.--, KENYNIA
D, DARDEN, CsR
PHO|OCOPY]NG I'F fEA