Page 116 - Mike Ratner CC - WISR Complete Dissertation - v6
P. 116

Deliberative Democracy and Freedom



                       Rostboll (2008) explored democratic theory and freedom and investigated the “different

               dimensions of freedom that make deliberation possible” (p. 3). He has labeled the relationship

               between deliberation and freedom as one of “mutual justification and reciprocal reinforcement”


               (p. 3) and posed the question “does deliberative democracy make people more free than other

               forms of democracy” (p. 209). Rostboll contended that the idea of freedom within the context of


               deliberative democracy encompasses many dimensions. His research on the topic seeks to bring

               clarity and understanding to the various intersections of freedom and deliberative democracy.



                       In particular, Rostboll (2008) developed a theory of deliberative democracy that addresses

               the role of political freedom. Regarding freedom and deliberative democracy, he stressed the desire


               to protect existing and future freedoms: “Deliberative democratic practices do not merely aim at

               protecting existing freedoms but also at interpreting and justifying the freedom that should be

               protected” (p. 4). Further, he defined deliberative freedom as the combination of four freedoms


               such as public autonomy and self-rule, negative freedom and noninterference; free formation of

               political  opinions  (internal  autonomy);  and  freedom  as  status.  He  also  distinguished  between


               dimensions and conceptions of freedom and the concept of political freedom to explain his idea of

               deliberative freedom and its relationship to earlier models and linkages between democracy and


               freedom. As such, negative freedom refers to using democracy to protect an already understood

               and demarcated freedom, vis-à -vis noninterference. Conversely, freedom as status relates the


               independence of individuals to create new expressions of being free (MacKinnon, 1989).


                       Rostboll  (2008),  in  his  research  on  the  intersections  of  freedom  and  deliberative

               democracy, instructed that the aim of deliberative democracy is an exercise of freedom. “It is not


               so much aimed at transforming preferences but at securing the transformation of preferences in a

                                                             97
   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121