Page 37 - The Apu Trilogy_ Satyajit Ray and the Making of an Epic

24 The Apu Trilogy

said, ‘I responded to Ford probably more deeply than he did,
because I would probably respond to the emotional quality in
Ford more than he would. But it’s not something one can be
heavy about.’
Of the hundred or so films that Ray saw while he was
in London, the revelations were unquestionably Vittorio de
Sica’s Bicycle Thieves, closely followed by Renoir’s The Rules of
the Game. Bicycle Thieves ‘gored’ him, Ray said. ‘I came out of
the theatre my mind fully made up. I would become a film-
maker’, he remarked in 1982 in his lecture ‘My life, my work’
(though, characteristically, he did not let on about this decision
even to Clare). ‘The prospect of giving up a safe job didn’t daunt
me any more. I would make my film exactly as De Sica had
made his: working with non-professional actors, using modest
resources, and shooting on actual locations. The village which
Bibhutibhusan [Banerji] had so lovingly described would be a
living backdrop to the film, just as the outskirts of Rome were
for De Sica’s film.’
In an excited letter to Chandragupta in Calcutta, Ray inad-
vertently revealed his future guiding principle as a film-maker,
rejecting Hollywood films as his model:

The entire conventional approach (as exemplified by even the

best American and British films) is wrong. Because the con-

ventional approach tells you that the best way to tell a story
is to leave out all except those elements which are directly
related to the story, while the master’s work clearly indicates
that if your theme is strong and simple, then you can include
a hundred little apparently irrelevant details which, instead of
obscuring the theme, only help to intensify it by contrast, and
in addition create the illusion of actuality better.

In a review of Bicycle Thieves he wrote for the Calcutta Film
Society’s bulletin, in which he largely dismissed the Italian films

9/16/2010 9:07:22 PM
Robinson_Ch01.indd 24 9/16/2010 9:07:22 PM
Robinson_Ch01.indd 24