Page 218 - The_story_of_the_C._W._S._The_jubilee_history_of_the_cooperative_wholesale_society,_limited._1863-1913_(IA_storyofcwsjubill00redf) (1)_Neat
P. 218

The Story of the C.W.S.

         1885) almost as the private venture of two individuals.  In 1889 the
         shareholders included seventy employees and private persons (some
         of the latter being store managers) and only twenty-three societies.
         And their association was not producing simply to meet the needs
         of its corporate members (as the Barnsley retail society made shoes),
         but  it was competing with the Crumpsall Works for the general
         trade of retail societies not otherwise supplying themselves.  In
         one instance (said Mr. E. Hibbert, of Failsworth and the C.W.S.
         Committee, who led the case against admission) the C.W.S. made and
         supplied mincemeat.  In the next season the demand was divided
         between the C.W.S. and the Sundries Society, and the Crumpsall
         Works had barrels left in stock.  To admit such a competitor to
         membership would be wrong.  "And," said Mr. Mitchell,  "  one wrong
         course will sometimes destroy the vitality of the most powerful
         institution."  The friends of admission, however, included a long
         list of well-known names.  The Sundries Society was a registered
         and accepted body, a member  of the Co-operative Union, and
         an exhibitor at Congress exhibitions.  The Congress leaders saw
                                                             "
         tyranny in exclusion. By E. V. Neale the question was put:  Does
        the Wholesale Society exist for co-operation, or co-operation  for
                       "
        the Wholesale ?   But the view taken by the C.W.S. Committee,
         "
          out of strong conviction, and not from prejudice of any kind,"
        decisively prevailed. The result of a discussion extending over two
         Quarterly Meetings (December, 1890, and March, 1891) was a vote
         of 319 for admission and 589 against.
           The Soap Works at Durham, meanwhile, pursued an even and
         uneventful course. ...   At  Leicester, during  1885, the then
         manager of the Boot Works, Mr. Dadley, died suddenly while on
         business for the Society in Paris, and Mr. John Butcher was induced
        to return to his old post.  He at once commenced to introduce the
        new American machines, which already were  revolutionising the
         boot trade—the C.W.S. being the first manufacturers to introduce
        complete sets of these inventions.  The price of leather was falling,
        also, although not at the same average rate as other commodities.
        Between 1875 and 1894 the cost of sugar, cotton, wheat, and wool
        all fell by more than 50 per cent, while in leather the average fall
        was only 22 per cent.  However, in the  first quarter of 1886 the
        Leicester Works reported an increased output of over 5,000 pairs,
        with a money return only £192 in excess.  The average price per
        pair had dropped from 5s. 5|d. to 5s. 2^d.  Later  still,  it fell to
        about  4s.  8d.,  the  general  tendency  being  furthered  by  an
                                    170
   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223