Page 55 - The_story_of_the_C._W._S._The_jubilee_history_of_the_cooperative_wholesale_society,_limited._1863-1913_(IA_storyofcwsjubill00redf) (1)_Neat
P. 55

Hills of Difficulty.
       Credit, or, rather, the non-payment of accounts due, was a minor
    difficulty.  By July, 1864, it had become necessary for the secretary
    to wait upon a certain society, by instruction of the Committee, and
    " demand the payment of our account."  At various times during
    the next few years defaulters were " written " or "  visited,' or even
    threatened with legal proceedings.  Although it had been decided
   that societies should not be obliged to buy from the federation,  it
    was still the rule that those who bought should pay.
       Internally there was the problem of securing the skill and zeal
   sufficient to build up so novel a business.  " From the pecuUarity of
   our trade," pleaded the Committee in their second report, "  we have,
   at present, difficulties to contend against which do not interfere with
   the operations of private traders." At the beginning the Committee
   had offered the position of buyer and manager to Samuel Ashworth,
   of the Rochdale Society.  The Rochdale committee,  however,
   promptly discovered an extra value in Ashworth and induced him
   to stay.  He had been one—the youngest—of the famous twenty-
   eight.  He had sold in Toad Lane the first packet supplied by the
   Pioneers' Society, which was the pound or so of sugar so indifferently
   wrapped that, for safety, the purchaser preferred to carry it in her
   apron.  Since those amateurish days Samuel Ashworth had remained
   manager of the Rochdale stores; and little wonder if his committee
   almost identified the success of the society with the possession of its
   reticent, tactful, upright, business-like servant.  So by means of
   public advertisement the Wholesale Committee engaged its buyers,
   trying  first one and then another in the search for ability with
   trustworthiness  combined.  Besides  having  their  separate and
   definite duties, the cashier, the buyer, and the very small staff were
   under regular  supervision.  The Committee—coming from other
   towns, and meeting usually on Saturday afternoons, fortnightly or
   monthly—naturally could not exercise a close oversight; but each
   month one of their number was appointed as visitor.  Nevertheless,
   all was not judged to be well.  As late as October, 1866, when nearly
   two hundred societies were in membership, and the turnover was
   approaching a quarter of a million yearly, the auditors filled five
   foolscap sheets with a severe, if not alarming, report on the conduct
   of the business.  In July of that year, also, William Nuttall wTote
   to James Smithies proving that different prices had been charged
   to different societies for the same  articles, the variation having
   amounted to as much as six shillings m the £.  .  ,  .  Two years
   later the then senior buyer and the cashier resigned, to come out m
                               35
   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60