Page 107 - Innovative Professional Development Methods and Strategies for STEM Education

Systematic Support for STEM Pre-Service Teachers

Labaree, D. F. (2000). On the nature of teaching and teacher education: Difficult practices that look easy.
Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 228–233. doi:10.1177/0022487100051003011
Lombardi, M. (2007). Authentic learning for the 21st century: An overview. Retrieved from http://net.
educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI3009.pdf

McDermott, L. C., & DeWater, L. S. (2000). The need for special science courses for teachers: two per-
spectives. In J. Minstrell & E. H. van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry science learning and teaching.
Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Means, B., Confrey, J., House, A., & Bhanot, R. (2008). STEM high schools: Specialized science tech-
nology engineering and mathematics secondary schools in the U.S. (Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Report). Retrieved from http://www.hsalliance.org/stem/index.asp

Moakler, M. W. Jr, & Kim, M. M. (2014). College Major Choice in STEM: Revisiting Confidence
and Demographic Factors. The Career Development Quarterly, 62(2), 128–142. doi:10.1002/j.2161-
0045.2014.00075.x
NAS/NAE. (2007). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter
economic future. Washington, D. C.: National Academies Press.

National Academy of Engineering. (2004). NAE Annual Report 2004. Retrieved from https://www.nae.
edu/File.aspx?id=43371

National Academy of Engineering. (2009). Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status
and improving the prospects. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2011). Expanding Underrepresented Minority Participation: America’s
Science and Technology Talent at the Crossroads. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

National Science Board. (2004). Science and engineering indicators 2004. Arlington, VA: National
Science Board.
National Science Board. (2007). National Action Plan for Addressing the Critical Needs of the U.S. Sci-
ence, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education System. Arlington, VA: National Science
Foundation.
National Science Board. (2008). Science and engineering indicators 2008. Arlington, VA: National
Science Foundation.

National Science Board. (2010). Science & Engineering Indicators 2010. Arlington, VA: National Sci-
ence Foundation.
Newmann, F. M., & Wehlage, G. G. (1993). Five standards for authentic instruction. Educational Lead-
ership, 50(7), 8–12.

Petraglia, J. (1998). The rhetoric and technology of authenticity in education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum.

88