Page 72 - Innovative Professional Development Methods and Strategies for STEM Education
P. 72

A Paradigm Shift for Teachers’ Professional Development Structure in Turkey



                   INTRODUCTION


                   The Importance of Professional Development
                   Programmes for Science Teachers


                   Considering today’s competition-based systems and developments on the international stage, one can
                   appreciate the importance of raising individuals possessing the skills that respond to the requirements of
                   our age (Miaoulis, 2009). For this reason, investment in science, technology, engineering, and mathemat-
                   ics (STEM) literacy are very much on the increase. In STEM education, as in all educational systems,
                   this investment and support focus on the students, teachers, and training programmes and the efficiency
                   and effectiveness of educational systems depend on these three elements moving in harmony towards a
                   specific target. A breakdown, weakness, ineffectiveness, or malfunctioning in any of these elements is
                   bound to lower the efficiency of the whole system. Today, academic performance and a positive change
                   in students in terms of various skills are considered to be the barometers of efficiency and success in
                   education.
                      The most important factor in ensuring these positive changes in students in terms of various skills
                   and academic performance is, undoubtedly, the teacher (Rivkin, Hanushek, & Kain, 2005), because,
                   as pointed out by researchers who have studied the link between the exercise of the profession and the
                   learning outcomes, a crucial relationship exists between teachers’ adequacy and students’ performance
                   (Hoy & Miskel, 2008; Junor-Clarke & Fourniller, 2012; Guskey, 2014). Training well-qualified teachers
                   is only possible through an effective implementation of the pre-service and in-service educational activi-
                   ties (Darling-Hammond, 1999; Darling-Hammond & Bransford, 2005). In order for teachers to keep up
                   with the contemporary requirements of the educational sector in their professional lives and to educate
                   individuals possessing the skills demanded of them, they need to constantly refresh their capabilities
                   and take part in the in-service training activities organized for this purpose. The link between in-service
                   training programmes and teachers’ professional development directly affects school development and
                   students’ learning quality (Kennedy, 1998). When this interaction is taken into account, the need for a
                   proper assessment of the targets and structuring of these in-service training programmes cannot be missed.

                   Structure and Implementation of Professional Development Programmes


                   All over the world, traditional in-service training programmes are implemented in the form of seminars
                   and presentations to raise the teacher’s teaching abilities and knowledge however, improving teachers’
                   performance in the classroom requires developing their practical skills (McCann, Alan, & Gail, 2012).
                   In-service training programmes should not only present teachers with the opportunity to learn new things
                   but also provide them with a setting where they can put their theoretical knowledge into practice (Avalos,
                   2011). Only in this way can in-service training programmes achieve their main goal of bringing about
                   a difference in teachers’ attitudes and beliefs, their ways of teaching, and their students’ performance
                   (Guskey, 2002). From this perspective, traditional in-service training concepts appear to have become a
                   learning environment for all. This transition has had an impact on the administrators, teachers, and the
                   schools which are continuous research settings for students (Fullan, 2001; Knight, 2007; Loucks-Horsley,
                   1995; Loucks-Horsley, Stiles, & Hewson, 1996).
                      In addition to being a process that needs prioritized planning and implementation that will allow
                   educational reforms to be applied and new approaches to be put into practice, in-service training for



                                                                                                           53
   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77