Page 65 - The 'X' Chronicles Newspaper - Jan-Feb 2018, Vol 27, No 1
P. 65

NASA Engineer Debunks Online UFOs                                                                                       65






                This Former NASA

            Engineer Has Debunked

          Pretty Much Every Online

                     UFO Sighting



                        scienceaf.com



          You've probably seen more than your fair share
          of stories about UFO sightings. An astronaut on
          the ISS just has to catch footage of a fireball
          shooting across Earth's skies, and conspiracy
          theorists have a field day.  Whether it's clouds
          that look like spaceships or rogue meteors, the
          internet loves a good alien conspiracy.
                 But former NASA engineer James Oberg
          has taken it upon himself to trawl through all the
          sightings and stories out there and politely
          debunk them, using science.
                 The conclusion? Most of your "insane
          UFO sightings" are little more than 'space
          dandruff', or your brain misunderstanding of
          what space travel actually looks like, says    spacecraft, Oberg explains on his site.                All of this isn't to say we should give up
          Oberg.                                                 These flecks of dandruff are pretty on sharing our UFO sightings, or assuming that
                 As Cara Giaimo from  Atlas Obscura      common, but the reason they look so weird to us everything is 'normal'.
          reports, after working at NASA mission control  is that we're not used to the way these objects       "It's good to keep scanning space video
          in the late '90s, Oberg went on to become a    look when they fall while the space station is for possible anomalies and reporting them
          space journalist and historian. It wasn't until a  travelling through space.                   quickly," Oberg told The Huffington Post back
          few years ago that he started to take UFO              It's the same reason why people see so in 2013.
          sightings seriously.                           many UFOs in the footage filmed by the                 "The reason is, there is always a real
                 His goal isn't to simply crap all over true  cameras attached to NASA's old space shuttle chance that it could be a genuine anomaly, either
          believers - he calls that "stomping on dormice" -  missions.                                   a spacecraft malfunction or other threat,
          instead he's interested in teasing out exactly         In these videos, people usually freak out expected or unexpected. In the past, missions
          what's going on in these images and videos, and  because the spots seem to dance in and out of have failed because a clue that should have been
          trying to figure out why people are reacting so  view, or suddenly appear and disappear. Which seen out the window was overlooked."
          strongly to them.                              is pretty creepy if you're sitting at your computer
                 His hypothesis? Our human senses are so  on Earth, but isn't that weird if you're on a space About James Oberg
          used to focussing on relatively slow-moving    shuttle travelling 28,000 km/h (17,500 mph) -
          objects, as well as certain light and atmosphere  nothing's going to stay in your frame of vision
          conditions, that when things change, our brains  very long.
          get confused.                                          And if the spacecraft is in the right
                 "Our sensory system is functioning      position in relation to the Sun, it can also cast its
          absolutely perfectly for Earth conditions,"    shadow onto these objects to make them
          Oberg told Giaimo. "But we're still a local    disappear and reappear, which is known as
          civilisation. Moving beyond our neighbourhood  'twilight shadowing'.
          has been visually confusing."
                 Some of the most common sighting he     That weird Californian flare across the
          has to debunk are to do with NASA astronauts
                                                         night sky
          reportedly seeing UFOS and being forced to
          keep silent, which Oberg says is a result of us
                                                         At the end of 2015, people in southern
          watching too much sci-fi and not really
                                                         California freaked out when they saw a bright
          understanding what space really looks like.
                                                         white light shoot across the night sky.         JAMES OBERG spent 22 years as a space
                 "I've had enough experience with real                                                   engineer at the Johnson Space Center in
                                                                 But, as was cleared up pretty soon after
          spaceflight to realise that what's being seen in                                               Houston,  TX where he specialized in NASA
                                                         the incident, it was actually the result of a
          many videos is nothing beyond the 'norm' from                                                  space shuttle operations for orbital rendezvous.
                                                         planned, unarmed missile test by the US Navy.
          fully mundane phenomena occurring in                                                           In honor of his pioneering work, on developing
                                                         That strange looking trail of light was the plume
          unearthly settings," Oberg writes over on his
                                                         of particles blasted out by the rocket thruster.  and documenting these space shuttle rendezvous
          site.
                                                                 So why did it look so creepy to everyone  techniques, he was named by the NASA-Area
                 Here are some of the more common
                                                         else? Because here on Earth, we're used to      "Association of  Technical Societies" as their
          reports you might have seen on the interwebs,
                                                         seeing thin vapour trails left by planes, or    1984 "Technical Person of the Year". In 1997 he
          and Oberg's explanation of what's really going
                                                         billowing smoke plumes. But most of us have     received the "Sustained Superior Performance"
          on:                                                                                            award for designing the complex first Space
                                                         rarely (if ever) seen anything so big and sharp as
                                                         this.                                           Station assembly mission.
          UFO sightings at the International                                                                    In support of NASA's spaceflight
                                                                 "There were thousands of people who
          Space Station                                  were absolutely processing their visual stimuli  operations he has written books on Rendezvous
                                                         correctly if [the plume] was a mile away or 10  Flight Procedures, on Mission Control Center
          The real story? Space dandruff, which are things  miles away [16 km]," Oberg told Atlas Obscura.  console operations, and on the history of orbital
          that have shed off space vehicles during flight,  "But it was 300 miles [482 km] away, up in   rendezvous. He provides expert assessment and
          like ice flakes, paint chips, or fragments of  space and sunlit, which never occurred to them,  forecasts of Russian space industrial and
          insulation.  They're different to space junk,  because this is not something within the normal  technological elements for corporate and
          because they don't pose a real threat to       range of human experience."                     government clients. []
   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70