Page 19 - 201009 - The 'X' Chronicles Newspaper - August 2010

August 2010_june_july_2009.qxd 30/08/2010 3:58 PM Page 19 Mind Control or Mind Psychosis? 19 62. Plaintiff is seeking protection for her unlawful conduct, and the Count V and all other Are Americans Being and for all family members under the law. pertaining Counts Defendants will continue to Subjected to Mind 63. Plaintiff and have a reasonable violate Plaintiffs’ legal rights unless enjoined and restrained by this Court. Control Radio expectation of privacy in their communications 71. Plaintiff seeks that this Court declare and/or records, mail communications, as Transmissions By U.S forementioned above, DNA, brain waves, brain that Defendants have violated their rights and Government Agencies? activities, brain manipulations, brain the rights of the public; enjoin the Count V Defendants, their agents, successors, and recordings, data mining, collected, and/or stored Continued from Page 18 by these activities. assigns, and all those in active concert and participation with them from violating the COUNT IV 64. Plaintiff have expectations of Plaintiffs’ rights under the Fourth Amendment complete privacy to the intrusions of their and respective Amendments, to the United Violation of First Amendment—Declaratory, minds and bodies, threats and fears, blackmail States Constitution; and award such other and Injunctive, and Other Equitable Relief and choice, thus freedom of thought, emotion, further equitable relief as is proper. will, and destiny. Violation of 18 U.S.C. and 50 U.S.C. Crimes COUNT VI and Criminal Procedures, War and National 65. Defendants have directly performed, Defense Including Titles 22, 42, 142, 18, 18a, or aided, abetted, counseled, commanded, Violation of Fourth Amendment—Damages and 50 U.S.C. and International induced, procured, encouraged, promoted, Conventional instigated, advised, willfully caused, (Plaintiff vs. Defendants) and parties, participated in, enabled, contributed to, inclusive of all affiliations (Plaintiff vs. Defendants) and parties, facilitated, directed, controlled, assisted in, or inclusive of all affiliations conspired in the commission of the above- 72. Plaintiff repeats and incorporates described acts of spying, torture, interception, herein by reference the allegations in the 59. Plaintiff repeats and incorporates and/or use of Plaintiff and her activities, by preceding paragraphs of this complaint, as if set herein by reference the allegations in the Intelligence, covertly without judicial or other forth fully herein; preceding paragraphs of this complaint, as if set lawful authorization, probable cause, and/or forth fully herein; individualized suspicion, in violation of 73. Plaintiff have a reasonable statutory and constitutional limitations, and in expectation of privacy in their communications 60. Plaintiff has been sabotaged with excess of statutory and constitutional authority. and/or records, mail, communications, coverage and expose to warn the public. Transmissions, intrusions, spying, by all means Plaintiff moves to compel the court for 66. At all relevant times, Defendants including electronics and waves as Defendants to provide the Constituents “WE committed, knew of and/or acquiesced in all of forementioned by Defendants. THE PEOPLE” with un-tampered accurate the above-described acts, and failed to respect news, appropriate warnings with Main Stream the Constitutional rights of the Plaintiff by 74. Plaintiff have expectations of Media to heed caution, be AWARE with obtaining judicial or other lawful authorization privacy to the atrocious intrusions and gross knowledge, and choice of action or recourse, and by conforming their conduct to the negligence. under the law of Constituents rights and United requirements of the respective Amendments, States Constitution. under the Law of the United States Constitution. 75. Defendants have directly performed, or aided, abetted, counseled, commanded, COUNT V 67. By the acts alleged herein, induced, procured, encouraged, promoted, Defendants have violated Plaintiffs’ reasonable instigated, advised, willfully caused, Violation of Fourth Amendment— expectations of privacy and denied Plaintiff her participated in, enabled, contributed to, Declaratory, Injunctive, and Equitable right to be free from unreasonable searches and facilitated, directed, controlled, assisted in, or Relief 108. seizures as guaranteed by the Fourth conspired in the commission of the above- Amendment to the Constitution of the United described acts of acquisition, interception, (Plaintiff vs. Defendants) and parties, States. By the acts alleged herein, as a victim of disclosure, divulgence and/or use of inclusive of all affiliations the Programs, Defendants violated Plaintiff’s communications, contents of communications, rights of the Fourth Amendment to be free from and records pertaining to their communications 61. Plaintiff repeats and incorporates unreasonable searches and seizures, as transmitted, collected, DNA and brain waves herein by reference the allegations in the guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment of the from Data Mining and remote transmissions, preceding paragraphs of this complaint, as if set United States Constitution. and/or stored, spying, torture, by Defendants forth fully herein; and all allegations under the without judicial or other lawful judicial or other law and aforementioned Amendments of the 68. By the acts alleged herein, lawful authorization, probable cause, and/or Constitution, as stated above. Defendants’ conduct has caused harm to individualized suspicion, in violation of Plaintiff and her family. statutory and constitutional limitations, and in excess of statutory and constitutional authority. 69. Defendants’ conduct was done intentionally, with malice and deliberate (Continued on Page 21) indifference, against her will and religion, and/or with reckless disregard of, negligent, COMING TO NIAGARA THIS forceful, trickery, pleasure, premediated NOVEMBER ON conspiracy, in gross violations of Plaintiff constitutional rights. 70. On information and belief, the Count V and all other pertaining Counts Defendants are now engaging in and will continue to engage PARAGATORS GEAR in the above-described violations of Plaintiffs’ is now available at constitutional rights, and are thereby irreparably THE ‘X’ ZONE STORE harming Plaintiff. Plaintiff has no adequate THE ‘X’ ZONE remedy at law for the Count V and all other www.xzonestore.com pertaining Counts to Defendants’ continuing WITH ROB McCONNELL