Page 19 - Wesak as a Public Holiday and Its Social Psychological Significance
P. 19

Wesak as a Public Holiday and Its Social Psychological Significance







                1933. Regardless of whether it was 1926
                or 1933, it was about this period that the
                idea of making Wesak a public holiday
                was mooted.


                       It is also likely that he was merely
                proposing  the  idea  but  not  vigorously
                pushing for it, hence the matter was not
                pursued further.  The events after WWII
                revealed  that  the  effort  to  get  Wesak
                declared as a public holiday was headed
                mainly  by  Mahayana  Buddhists,  an
                indication  that  their  effort  and  support
                was needed as they were the majority,
                compared to the Theravada Buddhists in
                the  country.  (In  1947,  the    Singapore
                Buddhist  Association  –  a  Sri  Lankan
                Buddhist association, made similar effort
                to  get  Wesak  declared  as  a  public
                holiday,  but  failed.    This  could  be
                because it was a small ethnic group)

                       However,  this  story  is  of  great
                s i g n i fi c a n c e ,   b e c a u s e   Ve n .   K .
                Gunaratana came from Sri Lanka, which
                already had Wesak as a public holiday as
                early as1885.  Hence, this story may be                 Fig  8:A  statue  of  Ven.  Migettuwatte
                traced back to the recent history of Sri                Gunananda erected by Buddhist devotees.
                Lanka.

                       In  its  recent  history,  the  British   Gampola debate and the 1873 Panadura
                colonised the coastal area of Sri Lanka          debate.
                since 1796, and by 1815, ruled the whole
                island via the Kandy Convention.  Under                The 1873 Panadura debate was a
                British  rule,  evangelists  from  the  West     crucial one.  At that time a Rev. David de
                flocked  to  the  island,  built  schools  and    Silva  openly  radiculed  Buddhism  in  a
                churches,  and  resorted  to  all  sorts  of     Methodist  church  in  Panadura.  Then
                unethical  means  to  gain  converts,            Ven.  Migettuwatte  Gunananda  (1823-
                including  condemning,  insulting,  and          1890),  (Fig.  8),  responded  by
                ridiculing Buddhism.                             challenging him for a debate.  The result
                                                                 of the debate was that the Buddhists won
                       In  response,  some  Buddhist             hands  down.    In  jubilation,  Buddhists
                monks  challenged  the  evangelists  for         paraded  the  Ven.  Migettuwatte
                debates.  This resulted in three Buddhist-       Gunananda from the venue of the debate
                Christian  debates  (five  if  the  written       to the railway station that took him back
                debates  were  also  included).    There         to  Colombo.    Many  other  celebrations
                were the 1866 Udanvita debate, the 1871          were held in temples in Sri Lanka.



                 Chapter 2: The Sri Lankan Connection                 Page18
   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24