Page 231 - Deep Learning
P. 231

214                         Adaptation

               A constraint base – the set of constraints a person believes hold in a
            domain of activity – is processed by matching the relevance patterns of all
            constraints against the situation at hand. The satisfaction patterns of those
            constraints that have matching relevance patterns are also matched against
            the current situation. If no constraints have matching relevance patterns
            or all constraints that have matching relevance patterns also have match-
            ing satisfaction patterns, then the situation is consistent with the person’s
            declarative knowledge. If at least one constraint with a matching relevance
            pattern has a nonmatching satisfaction pattern, then the new situation vio-
            lates that constraint and this tells the person that he has made an error.
            The set of constraints serves as a self-monitoring device by which the mind
            can judge the correctness of the solution path constructed by its (possibly
            incomplete or incorrect) practical knowledge. For example, cognitive psy-
            chologist Carl Martin Allwood concluded from a detailed study of errors in
            statistics problem solving that error detection occurs “when the problem
            solver perceives a discrepancy between the activity or result he or she has
                                                           18
            produced and one or more of his or her expectations.”  In general, errors
            appear subjectively as constraint violations, mismatches between the satis-
            faction conditions of one or more constraints and the actual properties of
            the situation at hand.
               Constraints generate expectations. When a relevance pattern is satisfied,
            there is an expectation that the corresponding satisfaction condition will be
            satisfied as well. In the normal course of everyday events, we are not aware that
            we anticipate effects and events. The fact that our minds are always one step
            ahead of the current state of the world becomes obvious when an expectation
            is violated. Imagine someone opening what looks like the front door of a house
            only to find a brick wall two feet from his nose. The resulting reaction shows
            that his mind was not neutral with respect to the unknowns on the other side
            of that door; if no hypothesis, expectation or prediction was unconsciously
            entertained, why the surprise? We are constantly applying knowledge about
            the world to anticipate the outcomes of our actions, even when we are not
            aware of doing so.  The machinery for executing a constraint base is a hypoth-
                          19
            esis about how this is done. The totality of the satisfaction conditions for all the
            constraints with matching relevance conditions is the person’s set of expecta-
            tions about the current situation.
               How wide a swath of declarative knowledge can be reconceptualized as
            consisting of constraints rather than propositions? Not only traffic laws but
            also  other  types  of  conventions,  from  punctuation  rules,  Robert’s  Rules  of
            Order and table manners to the rules for tic-tac-toe and the seating protocol
   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236