Page 293 - Deep Learning
P. 293

276                         Adaptation

            market, and to be too quick to ride an innovation. Carroll and Mui mention
            Eastman Kodak’s lack of response to the digital photography revolution as an
            example of the former. Xerox’s failure to take charge of the personal computer
            revolution is another. But there are as many cases in which a company invested
            heavily in an emerging technology that had less commercial potential than
            first appeared. Carroll and Mui describe the failure of Iridium, the Motorola
            subsidiary  that  developed  and  marketed  satellite  phones  for  a  brief  period
            before cell phones took over. A very different failure-prone move on their list
            is overly aggressive “financial engineering,” a type of error that requires moral
            rather than cognitive analysis.
               These strategies except the last are legitimate moves that have been carried
            out with good effect in many cases. Some applications of these strategies turned
            into failures because they were carried out at the wrong time, under the wrong
            circumstances. Expansions, continued investment in an established technology
            and attempts to ride an emerging technology succeed only when specific condi-
            tions are met. Carroll and Mui are quite explicit about those conditions, and the
            thrust of their analysis is that companies need to unlearn these types of strategic
            errors by adopting stricter conditions for when to apply each business strategy.
               Engineering design appears to be a qualitatively different endeavor, but many
            design errors can also be analyzed as actions taken when they should not have
            been.  For example, the Swedish warship Wasa sank in 1628 on its maiden voyage,
                21
            before leaving Stockholm harbor. Nobody hanged for this disaster, because the
            fault originated at the top. The Swedish warrior king Gustaf II Adolf had ordered
            the ship to support his military adventures on the European continent, and the
            king wanted sufficient firepower to protect his supply lines cross the Baltic Sea
            and to blockade his enemies. He asked for a second cannon deck, superimposed
            on a tried and true design for a warship with a single cannon deck. The taller
            hull and the heavy cannons on the upper deck conspired to elevate the center of
            gravity and made the ship so unstable that it capsized as soon as the wind hit its
            sails. The constraint that was violated is simple to state: Do not raise the center
            of gravity on a ship without testing the effect on its seaworthiness. Examples of
            constraint violations are equally salient in other fields of activity. World War II is
            a rich source of errors committed by military organizations, many of them fail-
                                                22
            ures to take counterindications into account.  These include the inability of the
            German high command to consider the possibility that their most secret military
            code, Enigma, had been broken, and to stop sending U-boats to their graves in
            the North Atlantic. On the other side of the battle, the Allied command launched
            the disastrous Operation Market Garden against the German front across the
            Netherlands in September of 1944 in spite of intelligence that German forces had
   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298