Page 16 - BANKING FINANCE JUNE 2016
P. 16

LEGAL UPDATE

Delight for lawyers; despair for judges                                                  SC directs demolition of

In 2000, disputes arose between the       Though the proceedings were going on           building for violation of
central government and members of a       for 13 years, there is no stopping in this     plan
consortium of oil companies, including    case, Cairn India Ltd versus Union of
ONGC, resulting in the con-                                                              The Supreme Court has ordered
stitution of two arbitral tri-                          India. The dispute remains                                    demolition
bunals. According to two                                whether the arbitration                                       of a multi-
contracts, arbitration                                  should be conducted in                                        storyed resi-
would be governed by the                                London or Kuala Lumpur.                                       dential
laws in India while the seat of arbitra-                Narrating the complex                                         building in
tion would be Kuala Lumpur.               course of this arbitration, the judg-
                                          ment stated that "the courts in India          Patna for gross violations of the sanc-
According to another limb of the          cannot resolve this dispute.                   tioned plan. The deviations are
agreement, the constitution of the                                                       "shocking and can be undertaken
arbitration tribunal and procedure        Either the parties agree to the place of       only by such person who considers
would be according to the laws of En-     sitting by expressly recording that it         himself to be law unto himself," the
gland. Arbitration had been held in       would only be the venue or they await a        court stated.
Kuala Lumpur from where it travelled      decision by the Federal Court of Appeals
to Amsterdam, due to a contagion in       in Kuala Lumpur… The situation is fairly       One of the deviations is that against
Malaysia, then to London.                 paradoxical, but courts are faced with         the sanction for 24 flats in six floors
                                          such situations. It cannot be helped."         at the rate of four flats per floor,
                                                                                         nine floors have been constructed
Project delay a factor in fixing power tariff                                            with six flats an each floor.

Those who draw power cannot be made liable to pay when there is a delay in               All flat owners shall vacate the build-
                                 installing switchgear, protection system, and meters    ing in six weeks and they will get
                                 on the part of the producer. The Supreme Court          compensation at the rate of Rs 7,000
                                 stated so while dismissing the appeal case, Power       per sq ft. The plea for compounding
                                 Grid Corporation vs Punjab Power Corporation.           the offence was rejected and those
                                                                                         who resist the order shall be force-
                                 The Grid Corporation is a transmission licencee of the  fully evicted, the court stated in the
                                 Barh-Balia transmission unit in Bihar, built by NTPC.   case, Babita Badasaria vs Patna Mu-
The Punjab Corporation was a beneficiary. They entered into a power supply               nicipal Corporation.
agreement for providing transmission lines. NTPC was supposed to provide
switchgear and other equipment.                                                          The original order of demolition was
                                                                                         passed in July 2014. But, the resi-
The Grid Corporation claimed that it had completed its work and wanted the               dents moved several applications
Central Electricity Regulatory Commission to determine the tariff. The Punjab            with proposals to avoid the crisis.
Corporation, then, raised an objection that the line was not operational. The            However, the court rejected all of
commission ruled that the tariff was payable.                                            them stating that "we do not find any
                                                                                         reason to change our mind and al-
Refund claim for excise to be decided within 3 months                                    low this illegal construction which is
                                                                                         contrary to law".
The Supreme Court has ruled that if there is a delay in the
refund of excise duty, the assessee firm is entitled to inter-                           The court appointed a commissioner
est on the amount the refund claim should be decided                                     to determine the claims of compen-
within three months from the date of the application.                                    sation and other modalities. It di-
                                                                                         rected the demolition within four
After that, interest shall be paid according to Section 11BB                             months and report compliance to it.
of the Central Excise Tariff Act, the court stated while dismissing the appeal of
the revenue authorities in the case, Union of India vs Hamdard Laboratories.
The company was engaged in the manufacture and sale of various items includ-
ing Rooh Afza, a sweetened non-alcoholic beverage.

16 | 2016 | JUNE                                                                         | BANKING FINANCE

Copyright@ The Insurance Times. 09883398055 / 09883380339
   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21