Page 15 - Banking Finance December 2016
P. 15

LEGAL UPDATE


          Bombay HC quashed                 DRT can interfere into SARFAESI Act: SC
          ONGC's order for black-           The Supreme Court ruled that the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) constituted
                                                                    under the DRT Act has jurisdiction to entertain an
          listing JK Surface                                        appeal arising from the SARFAESI Act even if the

          The Bombay High Court has quashed                         amount involved is less than Rs 10 lakh. This expla-
          the order of ONGC blacklisting JK Sur-                    nation became necessary because there was some
          face Coatings Ltd for three years and                     grey area in the DRT Act and the SARFAESI Act re-
          allowed it to participate in future                       garding loans below Rs 10 lakh. The DRT Act says it
          tenders/bids floated by the govern-  has jurisdiction for suits only above Rs 10 lakh; otherwise, the bank should move
          ment oil corporation. The private  the civil court. However, SARFAESI Act bars any role to civil court. Therefore,
          company specialises in corrosion re-  the court had to harmonise the provisions. The Supreme Court did so and al-
          sistant coating for offshore industries  lowed the appeal of the bank, against the ruling of the Delhi High Court.
          and claims to be the only one such in
          this country.                     Power firm liable for accidents from ill kept high-ten-

          The High Court stated that though  sion wires
          private companies can blacklist one  The Madhya Pradesh High Court ruled that the electricity distribution company
          another, a government entity must  is liable for the deaths and injuries caused by bad mainte-
          follow the principles of natural justice  nance of high tension wires.
          and proportionality. If these principles  The parent of an eight-year-old boy, who was electrocuted
          are violated, the court can intervene.  when a bus carrying a marriage party came into contact with
                                            live wire loosely hanging on the road. She made a complain
          SYL canal to be built             and received Rs. 25,000 as damages. The company opposed
          soon: SC orders Punjab            even this small sum arguing that the motor vehicle accident
          The Punjab-Haryana water dispute  tribunal had already awarded Rs. 1.8 lakh and therefore the
                                 flared up  parent was not entitled to further payment. The high court
                                            rejected the argument and stated that the victim was entitled to both amounts.
                                 ahead of
                                 Punjab     It further held that electricity was a "hazardous substance" according to the
                                            law. So the company handling it had a duty to keep it out of danger to the people.
                                 polls due
                                            If there is an accident and injury, compensation must be paid without apportion-
                                 early next
                                            ing blame, because it is a "no-fault" liability.
          year with the Supreme Court declar-
          ing as "unconstitutional" the state's
          2004 law, which unilaterally scrapped  SBI not liable for the purchase tax on Exim Scrips
          the 1981 agreement to share the   The Supreme Court has ruled that State Bank of India and its branches are not
          Ravi and Beas waters through the                    liable to levy purchase tax for accepting Exim Scrips (export
          Satluj-Yamuna Link (SYL) canal.                     import license), dismissing the appeal against the judgment
                                                              of the Calcutta High Court.
          The SC decision immediately heated
          up Punjab politics with Amarinder                   The question was whether SBI which are registered dealers
                                                              under the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act would be liable to
          Singh, who is seeking to unseat the
          Akalis and regain office, resigning his  levy of purchase tax for accepting the scrips on payment of premium of 20 per cent
          Amritsar Lok Sabha seat and the rul-  of the face value in compliance with the direction of Reserve Bank of India. The rev-
                                            enue authorities as well as the taxation tribunal had held against the SBI but the
          ing SAD-BJP making it clear that
          Punjab could not spare water for  high court had ruled in favour of the bank and quashed the show cause notices.
          other states. The court also said  57 debtors defaulted on Rs. 85,000 cr loan: SC
          Punjab has to construct the unfin-
                                            The Supreme Court said RBI's loan defaulters list, submitted in a sealed cover,
          ished portion of the SYL canal, as per
                                            showed that 57 debtors had failed to repay Rs. 85,000 crore and asked why their
          the SC's 2002 and 2004 judgments.
                                            names should not be made public.
            BANKING FINANCE |                                                            DECEMBER | 2016 | 15








                    Copyright@ The Insurance Times. 09883398055 / 09883380339
   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20