Page 20 - Insurance Times April 2019
P. 20

Charge No.   Brief Title of Charges and the provisions violated  Decision of the Authority
          1.           Charge : Entered agreements with Group Master Policy  Penalty of Rs. 5,00,000 and direction to
                       holders and making payouts in Violation of clause B-2  comply with all the relevant regulatory
                       and clause C-4 of Group Insurance Guidelines        provisions issued in this regard.
                       No. 015/IRDA/Life/ Circular/ GI/Guidelines/2005
                       dated 14/07/2005
          2.           Charge: i) Gift Card, foreign trips arranged to employee  i) Penalty of Rs. 5,00,000
                       of Corporate Agents through Various Sales campaign
                       ii) Entered service level agreements with Corporate
                       Agents and made payouts.
                       Violation of Clause 21 of Guidelines on Licensing of  ii) Penalty of Rs. 5,00,000
                       Corporate Agents No.017/IRDA/Circular/GI
                       Guidelines/2005 dated 14/07/2005
          3.           Charge: Contests floated for employees of the brokers  Penalty of Rs. 5,00,000
                       and remunerated them with gifts, foreign trips.
                       Violation of Regulation 19 of IRDAI (Insurance Brokers)
                       regulations 2002



         Behind this change is a fundamental shift in how insurance  in question on any ground after three years. Consumer
         companies differentiate themselves in today's consumer-  interest will be better served through provisions like those
         driven marketplace. Insurers have traditionally competed on  enabling penalties on intermediaries/insurance companies
         product features, where the uniqueness of a given product  for misconduct. It also disallows multi-level marketing of
         alone set it apart from the competition.  In today's market,  insurance products in order to curtail the practice of mis-
         however, an excessive feature set can be a detriment.  selling.

         Consumers expect to be able to quickly understand the  The amendments provide for an easier process for payment
         products and features available to them and, once they  to the nominee of the policy holder, as the insurer would
         make a choice, then initiate and complete an insurance  be discharged of its legal liabilities once the payment is
         purchase in a matter of minutes, especially when interacting  made to the nominee. It is now obligatory in the law for
         in an online or mobile environment. To offer that kind of  insurance companies to underwrite third party motor
         experience, insurers need products in their portfolios that  vehicle insurance as per IRDAI regulations.
         are both intuitive, so consumers can quickly understand
         them at the point of sale, and simple, so as to enable an  Rural and social sector obligations for insurers are retained
         automated underwriting and issuance process.         in the amended laws. Insurance sector regulator, IRDAI has
                                                              been empowered to regulate key aspects of insurance
         Penalty for Mis-selling:                             company operations in areas like solvency, investments,

         The amended insurance law provides for a penalty of up to  expenses and commissions.
         Rs 25 crore for mis-selling or misrepresentation of policies
         by agents or insurance companies to customers. The   Now, IRDAI has been empowered to appoint one or more
         Insurance Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2015 has several    of its officers as 'investigating officers' for inspection of the
         provisions for levying higher penalties ranging from up to  affairs of an insurance agent and to inspect his books,
         Rs 1 crore to Rs 25 crore for various violations including mis-  records and documents. The insurers would be responsible
         selling and misrepresentation by agents/ insurance   for all acts and omissions by its agents, including violations
         companies.                                           of the code of conduct specified under these guidelines. In
                                                              such cases, they would be liable to a penalty of up to Rs 1
         With a "view to serving the interest of the policy holders  crore (Rs 10 million). According to the norms, no individual
         better", the period during which a policy can be repudiated  can act as an agent for more than one life insurer, one
         on any ground will be confined to three years from the  general insurer, one health insurer and one of each type of
         commencement of the policy and no policy would be called  monoline insurers.

          20  The Insurance Times, April 2019
   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25