Page 41 - The Insurance Times September 2022
P. 41

Illegal  tie-in agreements,  between underwriters &  should  be  compensated  for  the  financial  losses  they
             some investors in return  for receiving  a  favorable  sustained for purchasing shares based on the misleading
             allocation of shares in the IPO.                 information. The settlement costs reach more than INR
                                                              1000Cr.
             Fraudulent use of money raised.
             Overcompensated or over matched management.
                                                              Redundancy program
             Failure to disclose material information.
                                                              Shortly after its IPO, a manufacturing company announces
             Forward looking statements.                      a major redundancy program. The company's share price
                                                              falls  straight  after  the  announcement,  resulting  in  an
             Profile  and accuracy  of  resumes  of  directors  and
                                                              immediate loss of value to many of the investors in the IPO.
             management.
                                                              Investors sued the company alleging non-disclosure of this
             False promises.
                                                              material information in the prospectus and after two years
             Quality of investment bank/adviser to the IPO.   of civil  litigation the manufacturer agrees a settlement
                                                              figure of more than INR 100Cr.
          Typical  Claim  scenarios  which  are
                                                              Missed profit targets
          covered under POSI -
                                                              A construction company issues a prospectus for an IPO which
          Failure to adequately inform                        includes financial forecasts for the forthcoming year. But the
          A manufacturing company initiates IPO, but its prospectus  company falls well short of its forecasts, issuing several profit
          fails to adequately report the poor quality of their assets.  warnings and the share price falls dramatically. Investors
          Shareholders who purchase rights based on this information  who purchased shares based on the prospectus pursue legal
          are disappointed when the share price falls following listing.  action to recover their losses, citing, amongst other things,
          Shareholders take legal action against the company claiming  the company, and its directors' misleading and deceptive
          that it failed to ensure that the prospectus information was  conduct.
          not misleading and that it did not omit any information
          reasonably required for a shareholder to make an informed Legal Disputes not disclosed
          assessment of the company's financial position.
                                                              A company withdraws its public rights offer shortly before
                                                              it is due to close after regulators receive a complaint that
          Overstatement of Financial Information              the company had failed to disclose that it was in substantial
          A company is  alleged to have materially  overstated its  legal disputes over terminated contracts. It's directors and
          financial position in its IPO prospectus. The regulator obtains  other individuals involved in preparing the prospectus face
          an interim court order to freeze the funds raised in the  investigation, legal action and possible civil and criminal
          offering.  During  this  time  the  regulator  conducts  liabilities for any false and misleading statements made in
          investigations and concludes that investors in the company  its prospectus.


                EU regulator backs use of Novavax COVID shot as a booster
           The European Medicines Agency backed the use of Novavax's COVID-19 shot as a booster for adults, ahead of an
           anticipated rise in infections this winter. The vaccine, Nuvaxovid, is designed to target the strain of the virus that
           originally emerged in China. The EMA's recommendation is for people who previously were inoculated with either the
           Novavax shot, or any other COVID vaccine.

           Separately, the EMA backed two separate COVID-19 vaccine boosters updated to target the Omicron variant of the
           virus. Developed by Moderna and the team of Pfizer and BioNTech, the new so called bivalent shots combat the BA.1
           version of Omicron and the original virus first detected in China.
           Novavax's Nuvaxovid made its debut well after first set of COVID-19 shots including those from Moderna, Pfizer-
           BioNTech, AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson were approved in different parts of the world.
           The hope was Nuvaxovid would incentivise people who were sceptical of some shots based on the newer mRNA
           technology to get vaccinated, given Nuvaxovid relies on technology that has been used for decades to combat diseases
           including hepatitis B and influenza.

                                                                     The  Insurance  Times,  September  2022  41
   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46