Page 24 - Banking Finance December 2024
P. 24

LEGAL UPDATE

          The ruling was delivered by a five-judge  party, particularly a government en-  The top court rejected the view taken
          constitutional  bench  comprising,  tity, has the sole authority to appoint  by it in a minority judgement in 1977
          Chandrachud  and  justices  Manoj  an arbitrator, it creates a power imbal-  and thereafter, in 1983 and 1997, that
          Mishra, Hrishikesh Roy, Pankaj Mithal  ance that undermines the fairness of  all private properties can be acquired
          and P.S. Narasimha.               the arbitration process.           by the State for the common good.
          Tushar Kumar, an advocate at the Su-                                 However, this court is unable to sub-
          preme Court, said, "Together, these  SC limits state's right ac-     scribe to the expansive view adopted
          measures refine India's business milieu,  quire private property     in the minority judgement authored by
          establishing a framework where con-                                  Justice  Krishna  Iyer  in  State  of
                                            In a landmark judgment that has im-  Karnataka  Vs  Ranganatha  Reddy
          tractual commitments are honored
          with a robust sense of fairness and  plications on a citizen's right to hold  (1977) and subsequently relied on by
                                            property, the Supreme Court ruled  this court in Sanjeev Coke Manufactur-
          dependability."
                                            that all privately-owned properties  ing  Co  Vs  Bharat  Coking  Coal  Ltd
          While  the  judgement  came  on   cannot be considered as "material re-  (1983), it added.
          Chandrachud's last working day, the  source of the community" and, there-
          finance ministry push came much ear-  fore, cannot be acquired by the State  Stating that the role of this court was
          lier in June, asking all arms of the gov-  to subserve the common good.  not to lay down economic policy, the
                                                                               CJI said that people have voted for the
          ernment, including PSUs to refrain
                                            A nine-judge Constitution bench led by  government which adopted varied eco-
          from arbitration if the disputed value  Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud  nomic policy.
          exceeded Rs. 10 crore.
                                            by a majority view held that Justice V  It would undermine the very principle
          The government has earned the moni-  Krishna Iyer's previous decision which  of the Constitution if all resources held
          ker of being the country's biggest dis-  declared that all privately owned re-  by the individuals are considered as
          putant, and state-run firms cutting  sources can be acquired by the State  material resources of the community,
          down on arbitration may slow India's  under Article 39(b), was motivated  he added.
          bid to compete with arbitration hubs  by a particular economic and socialist  Two other judges on the bench - Jus-
          such as London, Singapore and Dubai,  ideology.                      tices B V Nagarathna and Sudhanshu
          experts and practitioners said.
                                            The CJI writing the majority ruling for  Dhulia - however, partially differed
          Already, state-run firms have doubled  himself, and Justices Hrishikesh Roy,  with the CJI's majority judgment. Jus-
          down on the finance ministry push and  J.B. Pardiwala, Manoj Misra, Rajesh  tice Nagarathna termed the CJI's com-
          amended their general conditions of  Bindal, Satish Chandra Sharma and  ments on Justice Krishna Iyer as "un-
          contract.                         Augustine George Masih said that "the  warranted and unjustified". Justice
                                            direct question referred to this bench  Dhulia too recorded his "strong disap-
          PSU arbitration is back in fray as the
                                            is whether the phrase 'material re-  proval" on remarks made on Justice
          top court, in order to protect the rights
                                            sources of the community' used in Ar-  Krishna Iyer doctrine, saying "This criti-
          of private contractors, clipped the PSU                              cism is harsh and could have been
          practice of appointing arbitrators via a  ticle 39(b) of the Constitution includes
                                            privately owned resources. Theoreti-  avoided".
          panel of its own arbitrators.
                                            cally, the answer is yes, the phrase may
          "For PSUs, the implications of this judi-  include privately owned resources,"     Join
          cial decision are far-reaching, urging a
                                            The phrase material resource in Article
          re-assessment of dispute management                                       Online Certificate
                                            39(b) of the Constitution "may include
          strategies to avert the financial strains
                                            privately owned resources… Not every         Course on
          often inherent in lengthy arbitration
                                            resource owned by an individual can be
          processes," said advocate Kumar.  considered a 'material resource of the Motor Insurance
          The top court struck down this practice  community' merely because it meets  For details please visit
          as it could result in arbitrators being  the qualifier of 'material needs," the
                                                                                www.smartonlinecourse.co.in
          biased. The court noted that when one  majority opinion.


            22 | 2024 | DECEMBER                                                           | BANKING FINANCE
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29