Page 82 - Operations Strategy
P. 82

Judging OPERATiOns PERfORmAnCE AT An OPERATiOnAl lEvEl?  57
                             table 2.2  examples of ‘hard’ and ‘soft’ dimensions of specification quality

                             Examples of ‘hard’ dimensions of specification   Examples of ‘soft’ dimensions of specification
                             quality                               quality
                             Features                              Helpfulness
                             Performance                           Attentiveness
                             Reliability                           Communication
                             Aesthetics                            Friendliness
                             Security/safety                       Courtesy
                             Integrity


                             being related to interpersonal interaction, depend on the response of individual cus-
                             tomers relating with individual staff.

                             Speed
                             At its most basic, speed indicates the time between the beginning of an operations
                             process and its end. It is an elapsed time. This may relate to externally obvious events;
                             for example, from the time when the customer requests a product or service, to the
                             time when the customer receives it. Or it may be used internally in the operation; for
                             example, the time between when material enters an operation and when it leaves fully
                             processed. As far as operations strategy is concerned, we are usually interested in the
                             former. Part of this elapsed time may be the actual time to ‘produce the product or
                             service’ (the ‘core’ processing time). It may also include the time to clarify a customer’s
                             exact needs (e.g. designing a product or service), the ‘queuing’ times before operations
                             resources become available and, after the core processing, the time to deliver, transport
                             and/or install the product or service. Figure 2.4 illustrates some of the significant ‘pro-
                             cess’ times that signify the steps in customer response for two operations – a hospital
                             and a software producer. One issue for these organisations’ operations is how to define
                             the speed of delivery. Clearly, limiting it to the elapsed time taken by the core process
                             (though this is the part they can most directly control) is inadequate. From the cus-
                             tomers’ view, the total process starts when they become aware that they may need the
                             product or service and ends when they are completely satisfied with its ‘installation’.
                             Some may even argue that, given the need continually to engage the customer in other
                             revenue-generating activities such as maintenance or improvement, the process never
                             ends.

                             Dependability
                             The term ‘dependability’ is here used to mean keeping delivery promises – honouring
                             the delivery time given to the customer. It is the other half of total delivery perfor-
                             mance, along with delivery speed. The two performance objectives are often linked in
                             some way. For example, theoretically, one could achieve high dependability merely by
                             quoting long delivery times. In which case the difference between the expected delivery
                             time and the time quoted to the customer is being used as an insurance against lack
                             of dependability within the operation. However, companies that try to absorb poor
                             dependability inside long lead-times can finish up being poor at both. There are two
                             reasons for this. First, delivery times tend to expand to fill the time available. Attempt-
                             ing to discipline an operation to achieve delivery in two weeks when three are available
                             is unambitious and allows the operation to relax its efforts to use all the available time.









        M02 Operations Strategy 62492.indd   57                                                       02/03/2017   13:01
   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87