Page 322 - Fingerprints of the Gods by Graham Hancock
P. 322

Graham Hancock – FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS



                   skill and experience. It seemed,  moreover, as Flinders Petrie admitted
                   with some puzzlement after completing his painstaking survey of the
                   Great Pyramid, that these craftsmen had access to tools ‘such as we
                   ourselves have only now reinvented ...’
                                                                9
                     Petrie examined the sarcophagus particularly closely and reported that
                   it must have been cut out of its surrounding granite block with straight
                   saws ‘8 feet or more in length’. Since the granite was extremely hard, he
                   could only assume that these saws  must have had bronze blades (the
                   hardest metal then supposedly available) inset with ‘cutting points’ made
                   of even harder jewels: ‘The character of the work would certainly seem to
                   point to diamond as being the cutting jewel; and only the considerations
                   of its rarity in general, and its absence from Egypt, interfere with this
                   conclusion ...’
                                   10
                     An even bigger mystery surrounded the hollowing out of the
                   sarcophagus, obviously a far more difficult enterprise than separating it
                   from a block of bedrock. Here Petrie concluded that the Egyptians must
                   have:

                      adapted their sawing principle into a circular instead of a rectilinear form, curving
                      the blade  round into  a  tube,  which drilled out  a  circular  groove by its rotation;
                      thus by breaking away the cores left in such grooves, they were able to hollow out
                      large holes with a minimum of labour. These tubular drills varied from 1/4 inch to
                      5 inches diameter, and from 1/30 to 1/5 inch thick ...
                                                                          11
                   Of course, as Petrie admitted, no actual jewelled drills or saws had ever
                   been found by Egyptologists.  The visible evidence of the kinds of
                                                        12
                   drilling and sawing that had been done, however, compelled him to infer
                   that such instruments must have existed. He became especially
                   interested in this and extended his study to include not only the King’s
                   Chamber sarcophagus but many other granite artefacts and granite ‘drill
                   cores’ which he collected at Giza. The deeper his research, however, the
                   more puzzling the stone-cutting technology of the Ancient Egyptians
                   became:
                      The amount of pressure, shown by the  rapidity  with which  the drills and saws
                      pierced through the hard stones, is very surprising; probably a load of at least a
                      ton or two was placed on the 4-inch drills cutting in granite. On the granite core
                      No 7 the spiral of the cut sinks 1 inch in the circumference of 6 inches, a rate of
                      ploughing  out  which is astonishing ... These  rapid spiral  grooves cannot be
                      ascribed to anything but the descent of the drill into the granite under enormous
                      pressure ...
                                 13
                   Wasn’t it peculiar that at the supposed dawn of human civilization, more
                   than 4500 years ago, the Ancient Egyptians had acquired what sounded



                   9  Secrets of the Great Pyramid, p. 103.
                   10  The Pyramids and Temples of Gizeh, p. 74.
                     Ibid., p. 76.
                   11
                   12  Ibid., p. 78.
                   13  Ibid.


                                                                                                     320
   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327