Page 345 - Fingerprints of the Gods by Graham Hancock
P. 345

Graham Hancock – FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS



                   mathematicians and astronomers, had borne out his inspired hunch. His
                   evidence (reviewed fully in Chapter Forty-nine) showed that the three
                   pyramids were an unbelievably precise terrestrial map of the three stars
                   of Orion’s belt, accurately reflecting the angles between each of them and
                   even (by means of their respective sizes) providing some indication of
                   their individual magnitudes.  Moreover, this map extended outwards to
                                                     6
                   the north and south to encompass several other structures on the Giza
                   plateau—once again with faultless precision.  However, the real surprise
                                                                        7
                   revealed by Bauval’s astronomical calculations was this: despite the fact
                   that some aspects of the Great Pyramid did relate astronomically to the
                   Pyramid Age, the Giza monuments as a whole were so arranged as to
                   provide a picture of the skies (which alter their appearance down the ages
                   as a result of precession of the equinoxes) not as they had looked in the
                   Fourth Dynasty around 2500 BC, but as they had looked—and only as they
                   had looked—around the year 10,450 BC.
                                                                  8
                     I had come to Egypt to go over the Giza site with Robert Bauval and to
                   question him about his star-correlation theory. In addition I wanted to
                   canvass his views on what sort of human society, if any, could have had
                   the technological know-how, such a  very long while ago, to measure
                   accurately the altitudes of the stars and to devise a plan as mathematical
                   and ambitious as that of the Giza necropolis.
                     I had also come to meet another  researcher who had challenged the
                   orthodox chronology of Ancient Egypt with a well-founded claim to have
                   found hard evidence of a high civilization in the Nile Valley in 10,000 BC
                   or earlier. Like Bauval’s astronomical data, the evidence had always been
                   available but had failed to attract the attention of established
                   Egyptologists. The man responsible for bringing it before the public now
                   was the American scholar, John Anthony West, who argued that the
                   specialists had missed it—not because they had failed to find it, but
                   because they had found it and had failed to interpret it properly.
                                                                                              9
                     West’s evidence focused on certain key structures, notably the Great
                   Sphinx and the Valley Temple at Giza and, much farther south, the
                   mysterious Osireion at Abydos. He argued that these desert monuments
                   showed many scientifically unmistakable signs of having been weathered
                   by  water,  an erosive agent they could only have been exposed to in
                   sufficient quantities during the damp ‘pluvial’ period that accompanied
                   the end of the last Ice Age around the eleventh millennium  BC.  The
                                                                                                  10
                   implication of this peculiar and  extremely distinctive pattern of
                   ‘precipitation induced’ weathering, was that the Osireion, the Sphinx, and




                   6  The Orion Mystery.
                   7  Ibid.
                     Ibid.
                   8
                   9  Serpent in the Sky, pp. 184-242.
                   10  Ibid., 186-7.


                                                                                                     343
   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350