Page 408 - Fingerprints of the Gods by Graham Hancock
P. 408

Graham Hancock – FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS



                   features.’
                              6
                     Wind/sand erosion presents a very different profile of sharp-edged
                   horizontal channels selectively scoured out from the softer layers of the
                   affected rock. Under no circumstances can it cause the vertical fissures
                   particularly visible in the wall of the Sphinx enclosure. These could only
                   have been ‘formed by water running down the wall’,  the result of rain
                                                                                   7
                   falling in enormous quantities, cascading over the slope of the Giza
                   plateau and down into the Sphinx enclosure below. ‘It picked out the
                   weak spots in the rock,’ Schoch elaborated, ‘and opened them up into
                   these fissures—clear evidence to me as a geologist that this erosional
                   feature was caused by rainfall.’
                                                       8
                     Although in some places obscured  by repair blocks put in place by
                   numerous restorers over the passing  millennia, the same observation
                   holds true for the scooped-out, undulating, scalloped coves that run the
                   entire length of the Sphinx’s body. Again, these are characteristic of
                   precipitation-induced weathering because only long periods of heavy
                   rainfall beating down on the upper parts of the immense structure (and
                   cascading over its sides) could have produced such effects. Confirmation
                   of this comes from the fact that the limestone out of which the Sphinx
                   was carved is not uniform in its composition, but consists of a series of
                   hard and soft layers in which some of the more durable rocks recede
                   farther than some of the less durable rocks.  Such a profile simply could
                                                                       9
                   not have been produced by wind erosion (which would have selectively
                   chiselled out the softer layers of rock) but ‘is entirely ‘consistent with
                   precipitation-induced weathering where you have water, rain water
                   beating down from above. The rocks higher up are the more durable ones
                   but they recede back farther than some of the less durable rocks lower in
                   the section which are more protected.’
                                                                10
                     In his summing up at the AAAS meeting, Schoch concluded:
                      It’s  well known that  the Sphinx  enclosure fills  with sand very quickly, in just a
                      matter of decades, under the desert conditions of the Sahara. And it has to be dug
                      out periodically. And this has been the case since ancient times. Yet you still get
                      this dramatic  rolling,  erosional profile in  the Sphinx  enclosure ... Simply put,
                      therefore, what I’m suggesting is that this rolling profile, these features seen on
                      the body and in the Sphinx ditch, hark back to a much earlier period when there
                      was  more precipitation in  the  area, and more  moisture,  more  rain  on the Giza
                      plateau.’
                              11
                   As Schoch admitted, he was not the first geologist to have noticed the
                   ‘anomalous precipitation-induced weathering features on the core body



                   6  Mystery of the Sphinx.
                   7  Ibid.
                   8  Ibid.
                     Ibid.
                   9
                   10  Ibid.
                   11  AAAS Annual Meeting 1992.


                                                                                                     406
   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413