Page 477 - Fingerprints of the Gods by Graham Hancock
P. 477

Graham Hancock – FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS



                   1  that the Great Sphinx is indeed,  as we have argued in previous
                       chapters, an equinoctial marker for the Age of Leo, indicating a date in
                       our own chronology of between 10,970 BC and 8810 BC;


                   2  that the three principal pyramids are indeed laid out in relation to the
                       Nile Valley to mimic the precise dispositions of the three stars of
                       Orion’s Belt in relation to the course of the Milky Way in 10,450 BC.

                     This is a pretty effective means of ‘specifying’ the epoch of the eleventh
                   millennium  BC by using the phenomenon of precession, which has been
                   rightly described as the ‘only true clock of our planet’.  Confusingly,
                                                                                        23
                   however, we also know that the Great Pyramid incorporates star shafts
                   ‘locked in’ to Orion’s Belt and Sirius at around 2450 BC.  The hypothesis
                                                                                     24
                   resolves the anomaly of the missing years by supposing the star shafts to
                   be merely the later work of the same  long-lived cult that originally laid
                   out the Giza ground-plan in 10,450  BC. Naturally, the hypothesis also
                   suggests that it was this same cult, towards the end of those 8000
                   missing years, that provided the initiating spark for the sudden and ‘fully
                   formed’ emergence of the literate historical civilization of dynastic Egypt.
                     What remains to be guessed at are the motives of the pyramid builders,
                   who were presumably the same people as the mysterious cartographers
                   who mapped the globe at the end of the last Ice Age in the northern
                   hemisphere. If so, we might also  ask why these highly civilized and
                   technically accomplished architects  and navigators were obsessed with
                   charting the gradual glaciation of the enigmatic southern continent of
                   Antarctica from the fourteenth millennium BC—when Hapgood calculates
                   that the source map referred to by Phillipe Buache was drawn up—down
                   to about the end of the fifth millennium BC?
                     Could they have been making a permanent cartographical record of the
                   slow obliteration of their homeland?
                     And could their overwhelming desire to transmit a message to the
                   future through a variety of different media—myths,  maps, buildings,
                   calendar systems, mathematical harmonies—have been connected to the
                   cataclysms and earth changes that caused this loss?



                   An urgent mission

                   The possession of a conscious, articulated history is one of the faculties
                   that distinguishes human beings from animals. Unlike rats, say, or sheep,
                   or cows, or pheasants, we have a past which is separate from ourselves.
                   We therefore have the opportunity, as I have said, to learn from the
                   experiences of our predecessors.
                     Is it because we are perverse, or misguided, or simply stupid that we

                   23  By Robert Bauval, personal communication.
                   24  See Part VII.


                                                                                                     475
   472   473   474   475   476   477   478   479   480   481   482