Page 85 - Fingerprints of the Gods by Graham Hancock
P. 85

Graham Hancock – FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS





                   Chapter 11


                   Intimations of Antiquity


                   In his voluminous work Tiahuanacu: the Cradle of American Man, the late
                   Professor Arthur Posnansky (a formidable German-Bolivian scholar whose
                   investigations at the ruins lasted for almost fifty years) explains the
                   archaeo-astronomical calculations which led to his controversial re-dating
                   of Tiahuanaco. These, he says, were based ‘solely and exclusively on the
                   difference in the obliquity of the ecliptic of the period in which the
                   Kalasasaya was built and that which it is today’.
                                                                           1
                     What exactly is ‘the obliquity of  the  ecliptic’, and why does it make
                   Tiahuanaco 17,000 years old?
                     According to the dictionary definition it is ‘the angle between the plane
                   of the earth’s orbit and that of the celestial equator, equal to
                   approximately 23° 27’ at present’.
                                                           2
                     To clarify this obscure astronomical notion, it helps to picture the earth
                   as a ship, sailing on the vast ocean of the heavens. Like all such vessels
                   (be they planets or schooners), it rolls slightly with the swell that flows
                   beneath it. Picture yourself on board that ship as it rolls, standing on the
                   deck, gazing out to sea. You rise up on the crest of a wave and your
                   visible horizon increases; you fall back into a trough and it decreases.
                   The process is regular, mathematical, like the tick-tock of a great
                   metronome: a constant, almost imperceptible, nodding, perpetually
                   changing the angle between yourself and the horizon.
                     Now picture the earth again. Floating in space, as every schoolchild
                   knows, the axis of daily rotation of our beautiful blue planet lies slightly
                   tilted away from the vertical in its  orbit around the sun. From this it
                   follows that the terrestrial equator, and hence the ‘celestial equator’
                   (which is merely an imaginary extension of the earth’s equator into the
                   celestial sphere) must also lie at an angle to the orbital plane. That angle,
                   at any one time, is the obliquity of the ecliptic. But because the earth is a
                   ship that rolls, its obliquity changes in a cyclical manner over very long
                   periods. During each cycle of 41,000 years the obliquity varies, with the
                   precision and predictability of a Swiss chronograph, between 22.1° and




                   1  Tiahuanacu, II, p. 89.
                   2  Collins English Dictionary, London, 1982, p. 1015. In addition, Dr John Mason of the
                   British Astronomical Association defined obliquity of the ecliptic in a telephone interview
                   on 7 October 1993: ‘The earth spins about an axis which goes through its centre and its
                   north and south poles. This axis is inclined to the plane of the earth's orbit around the
                   sun. This tilt is called the obliquity of the ecliptic. The current value for the obliquity of
                   the ecliptic is 23.44 degrees.’



                                                                                                      83
   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90