Page 154 - The Social Animal
P. 154

136 The Social Animal


           Let’s look at three of the most common judgmental heuristics—the
           representative heuristic, the availability heuristic, and the attitude
           heuristic.

           The Representative Heuristic According to Daniel Kahne-
                                32
           man and Amos Tversky, when we use the representative heuristic,
           we focus on the similarity of one object to another to infer that the
           first object acts like the second one. For example, we know that high-
           quality products are expensive; therefore, if something is expensive,
           we might infer that it is really good.Thus, if I see two bottles of wine
           on the shelf and one has a higher price, I leap to the conclusion that
           the more expensive one is the better wine. I select the one feature
           (price) from among the many others that I might have focused on—
           such as type of grape, vintner, vintage, wine-growing region—and I
           use that to make my decision. But, as most smart consumers know,
           high price does not always mean high quality. Let’s look in more de-
           tail at the implications of the use of the representative heuristic by
           eavesdropping on a conversation between mother and child in the
           aisle of a local supermarket.
               Picture the scene: Seven-year-old Rachel spots her favorite ce-
           real, Lucky Charms, takes a box off the shelf, and quietly delivers it
           to the shopping cart. Her mom looks at the box in disgust. It is bright
           red. A leprechaun is sprinkling shining stars (must be sugar) over
           pink and purple marshmallow bits. On the back of the box, her mom
           finds a message informing her that a special, enclosed pair of glasses
           can be used to find hidden leprechauns.
               Mom sternly announces, “Rachel, put that junk back on the
           shelf. It is loaded with sugar and nothing but empty calories.”
               Rachel replies, “But Mom, it tastes good.”
               Being a smart mom, she offers Rachel another choice and a lit-
           tle inducement.“Why not try this one? It’s called 100% Natural Gra-
           nola. It is good for you. Eat this and you’ll grow up to be a big girl.”
               Rachel looks at the box. It is small but heavy. The picture on the
           front features a bowl of light brown cereal set against a wood-grain
           background and a couple of stalks of unprocessed grains. On the
           back of the box is a lot of small, hard-to-read writing.
               Rachel exclaims, “Yukko! I don’t want to be a big girl.”
               How would you resolve the great breakfast cereal standoff?
           Would you side with the mother and opt for nutrition, even though
   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159