Page 224 - The Social Animal
P. 224

206 The Social Animal


               The data from Mills’s experiment are provocative indeed. One
           thing they suggest is that the most zealous opponents of a given po-
           sition are not those who have always been distant from that position.
           For example, one might hazard a guess that the people who are most
           angry at the apparent sexual freedom associated with the current
           generation of young people may not be those who have never been
           tempted to engage in casual sexual activity themselves. Indeed,
           Mills’s data suggest the possibility that the people who have the
           strongest need to crack down hard on this sort of behavior are those
           who have been sorely tempted, who came dangerously close to giv-
           ing in to this temptation, but who finally resisted. People who almost
           decide to live in glass houses are frequently the ones who are most
           prone to throw stones.
               By the same token, it would follow that those individuals who
           fear that they may be sexually attracted to members of their own sex
           might be among those most prone to develop antigay attitudes. In an
                                                             30
           interesting experiment, Henry Adams and his colleagues showed a
           group of men a series of sexually explicit erotic videotapes consisting
           of heterosexual, male homosexual, and lesbian encounters while
           measuring their sexual arousal (actual changes in their penile circum-
           ference). Although almost all of the men showed increases in sexual
           arousal while watching the heterosexual and lesbian videos, it was the
           men with the most negative attitudes toward male homosexuals who
           were the most aroused by the videos depicting male homosexual
           lovemaking.
               Early in this chapter, I mentioned that the desire for self-justifi-
           cation is an important reason why people who are strongly commit-
           ted to an attitude on an issue tend to resist any direct attempts to
           change that attitude. In effect, such people are invulnerable to the
           propaganda or education in question. We can now see that the same
           mechanism that enables a person to cling to an attitude can induce
           that individual to change an attitude. It depends on which course of
           action will serve most to reduce dissonance under the circumstances.
           A person who understands the theory can set up the proper condi-
           tions to induce attitude change in other people by making them vul-
           nerable to certain kinds of beliefs. For example, if a modern
           Machiavelli were advising a contemporary ruler, he might suggest
           the following strategies based on the theory and data on the conse-
           quences of decisions:
   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229