Page 290 - Through New Eyes

292 NOTES TO PAGES 14-29

9. For a full discussion, see Jordan, “Saul: A Study in Original Sin,” The Geneva
Papers 2:11 (July, 1988; Tyler, Texas: Geneva Ministries).
10. Roderick Campbell, Israel and the New Covenant (Tyler, TX: Geneva Ministries,
[1954] 1983), p. 60. Also see Othmar Keel, The Symbolism of the Biblical World:
Ancient Near Eastern Iconography and the Book of Psalms, trans. Timothy J. Hallett
(New York: Seabury Press, 1978).
11. David Chilton, The Days of Vmgeance: An Exposition of the Book of Revelation (Fort
Worth: Dominion Press, 1987), p. 33.
12. Ibid., pp. 344ff.
13. Ben C. Ollenburger, Zion, Cip of the Great King: A Theological Symbol of the Jeru-
salem Cult (Sheffield, England: Sheffield Academic Press, 1987), pp. 19-20.
14. In the course of this book I shall have occasion to note several such studies. I
wish to advise the reader that my endorsement of such works is highly selective.
15. The most useful discussion of the difference between Biblical typology and
Greek allegory in the Church Fathers is Jean Dani410u, From Shadows to Reali~:
Studies in the Biblical TypologY of the Fathem, trans. Wulstan Hibberd (Westminster,
MD: Newman Press, 1960). On the history of typology, see Richard M. David-
son, TypologY in Scripture: A Study of Hermeneutical TYPOS Structures (Berrien
Springs, MI: Andrews University Press, 1981).

Chapter 2 – The Purpose of the World
1. Note written by Luther inside a book of Pliny. Martin E. Marty, Health and
Medicine in the Lutheran Tradition (New York: Crossroad Pub., 1983), p. 27.
2. The best discussion of the philosophy of “Being” versus Christianity is Rousas
J. Rushdoony, The One and the Many (Tyler, TX: Thoburn Press, [1971] 1978).
3. Herman Bavinck, The Doctrine of God, trans. William Hendriksen (Edinburgh:
The Banner of Truth Trust, [1918] 1977), p. 91.
4. Ibid., P. 88.
5. Quote~ in ibid.
6. The finest single essay on this subject is Cornelius Van Til, “Nature and Scrip-
ture ,“ in Paul Woolley, ed., The Infallible Word, 3d ed. (Phillipsburg, NJ: Pres-
byterian and Reformed Pub. Co., 1967). Van Til shows that natural revelation
is necessary, authoritative, sufficient, aml dear. From an different theO@Cal
tradition, see the remarks of Alexander Schmemann, For the Lye of the World
(Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1973), pp. 117-134.
7. John M. Frame, The Doctrine of the Knowledge of God (Phillipsburg, NJ: Presby-
terian and Reformed Pub. Co., 1987), p. 230.
8. Bavinck, p. 88.
9. Ibid., p. 89.
10. Van Til, in Woolley, p. 273.
11. Bavinck, pp. 86-7. Bavinck continues, “Further, human actions are ascribed to Gcxl,
as, knowing, Genesis 18:21; trying, Psalm 7:9; thinking, Genesis 50:20. .”
He fills half a page with these.
12. Ibid., p. 87.
13. Ibid., p. 97.

Chapter 3 — Symbolism and Worldview
1. While any survey of the history of philosophy can be consulted for more infor-
mation on this, for our purposes the best introduction is Rousas J. Rushdoony,
The One and the Many (Tyler, TX: Thoburn Press, [1971] 1978). On the subject