Page 54 - CJO_F17_GLAUCOMA_SUPPLEMENT
P. 54

C  CLINICAL RESEARCH




               To properly assess the effectiveness of each drug in an individual treatment regimen, single medications are nor-
               mally added one at a time. Having said that, however, the algorithm does note the addition of FC medications. The
               clinician should be aware that while some granularity will be lost with respect to the effect of individual medications
               in the FC, the IOP response is expected to be fast and significant. This is perhaps a more important consideration in
               severe disease and when encountering very high eye pressures. Not apparent in the algorithm is the fact that SLT,
               minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGS) and other surgical interventions may be pursued at any time during
               the management continuum. Certainly, those patients for whom progression continues to be documented despite
               maximum tolerated medical therapy (MTMT), should be referred for surgical consultation. MTMT is defined as
               the largest number of medications that the patient can tolerate and consistently administer.

               Currently, the first-line treatment for glaucoma is a prostaglandin analogue (PGA; see STEP 1). Given that these medi-
               cations allow for the largest reduction in IOP with a single drop per day, are well-tolerated, lower IOP over 24 hours,
               and have relatively few systemic adverse effects, this is the starting point for the treatment algorithm. If progression
               is suspected or targets not achieved despite a reasonable follow-up period, it is recommended to switch within the
               prostaglandin analogue class prior to moving to STEP 2. Clinicians begin to differ after this point, but STEP 2 may be
               one of three options. Adding a beta-blocker in the morning allows the clinician to tailor this treatment to some extent
               with choice of agent, concentration and dosing frequency as well as assess for adverse effects. This is also a relatively
               inexpensive option to consider. The second option is to switch the prostaglandin analogue to a FC agent with that
               medication and timolol. This provides a number of advantages including fewer bottles and fewer drops (one per day
               rather than two), thereby reducing the exposure of the ocular surface to preservatives. The third and fourth options
               include leaving the PGA in place but adding either a single agent CAI or alpha agonist, or proceeding directly to a FC
               of one of these agents with timolol. Progress through STEPS 3 and 4 are dependent on this choice as per Figure 16. If it
               is determined that a beta-blocker is not an option at STEP 2, a single agent CAI or alpha agonist may be added. In some
               circumstances, the fixed combination without beta-blocker (brimonidine / brinzolamide) may be started right away.
               Regardless of what treatment is employed, a thoughtful, evidence-based approach must be taken and all compo-
               nents discussed with the individual and informed consent obtained. The consideration of preexisting and iatrogenic
               ocular surface disease must also remain an ongoing focus.


                                                     359
               Figure 16: General approach to medical management






































      54             CANADIAN JOURNAL of OPTOMETRY    |    REVUE CANADIENNE D’OPTOMÉTRIE    VOL. 79  SUPPLEMENT 1, 2017
   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59