Page 397 - All files for Planning Inspectorate update

The scheme still represents a high density for its edge-of-settlement location, but this
is justified by the 50+ dwelling allocation in the Ashurst Wood Neighbourhood Plan
and policy ASW5 which generate a flat-based scheme. With respect to policy ASW9
(that applies specifically to this site), the intensive use of the site does not reflect the
predominant lower density character of the area but on the other hand is not
dissimilar to the typology of the existing blocks of flats on the adjacent site. The
proposed 3 and 4 storey buildings are also a similar height to the building they will
replace and are well set-back from the site boundary and retain/safeguard the trees /
woodland around its eastern and south western boundaries that ensures the
development will be mostly screened and will therefore have limited visual impact. In
addition, the revised drawings have involved re-modelling the frontages and setting
back the top floors of the blocks nearest to the site entrance.

The contemporary architecture is a contrast to much of the surrounding buildings but
is considered acceptable as the facades are well organised and there is little inter-
visibility with the surrounds.

On balance including consideration of policy DP26, I do not object to the application
but would recommend the following conditions requiring approval of additional
information to secure the quality of the design:

 1:20 scale elevation (vignette) and section drawings of the front elevation of the
block with units 13-20.
 Detailed landscape plan including boundary treatments.
 Facing materials including windows
 Design and layout of solar panels and lift-housing on the roof

Design Review Panel (comments on original plans)

The panel support the scheme subject to changes being made to the elevations of
the buildings to prevent them being too block like and commercial. The proximity of
the existing building (referred to as the "Barn") on the eastern boundary to the
proposed block (plots 7-12) was a concern.

Conservation Officer

It is considered that the visual impact of the proposal from Lewes Road will be
minimal, and as such it is not considered to have an impact on the existing edge-of-
town character of the setting of Camden Cottage. The proposal therefore meets the
requirements of Local Plan Policy DP34 and the relevant paragraphs of the NPPF.

Housing Officer

The applicant is of the view that the development cannot viably deliver any onsite
affordable housing or pay any contribution in lieu and has provided a Viability
Appraisal setting out his position. An independent valuer has been appointed to
undertake an assessment of the information submitted and although it would appear
that the scheme as currently presented would not enable 17 Affordable Housing
units to be viably provided, a scheme of 6 units for affordable rent and 3 units for