Page 12 - Combined file Solheim

APPLICATION FOR ASSISTANCE OF A M KENZIE FRIEND
C
PART 4:SOURCE OF FUNDS
34. LPJS made it clear to her former solicitors that if the £500,000 is judged to be the
proceeds of crime she will unhesitatingly assist in its return to the insurers concerned;
otherwise she urges the Court to confirm that it remains a gift. AIG has indicated to MJC
that the £525,397,60 was a genuine claim and the Family Court (see paragraph 138)
concluded that the £500,000 derived from it was a gift and her asset.

35. To understand the case and LPJS’s counterclaim, it is necessary to note the convergence of
the Claimant’s funding, the £500,000 and the Final Hearing of her divorce. LPJS contends
that the Claimant’s fixation on concealing his dishonesty and refusal to give evidence on
her behalf caused her to lose approximately £765,000 in lifetime maintenance from her
former husband.

Paragraphs relating to the divorce hearings are distinguished in this submission by use
of the Book Antigua font.

Bates Number Bates No012 6 | Page