Page 25 - American College of Trial Lawyers Federal Criminal Procedure Committee 2020 Update: Recommended Practices for Companies and Their Counsel in Conducting Internal Investigations
P. 25

during the employee interviews.  The risks of having in-house or regular outside counsel present at
                 interviews include inadvertently chilling the employee’s willingness to be forthcoming and having the
                 employee incorrectly perceive that she is represented personally by company counsel.  The presence
                 of in-house or regular outside counsel for the company may also implicate concerns regarding the
                 independence of Investigatory Counsel.  At the very least, the issue should be thoroughly vetted
                 with the Independent Committee before counsel other than Investigatory Counsel takes a seat at the
                 investigating table.


                                In some instances, it may be necessary for the company to pay for separate legal
                 counsel for employees who are being interviewed and may have – or may appear to have – interests
                 adverse to the company.   However, depending upon the company’s bylaws, it should not be
                                       71
                 necessary to suggest separate counsel until such adversity becomes sufficiently clear or until an
                 employee requests separate counsel.  An employee may on her own choose to seek the advice of
                 counsel and ask that counsel be present for the interview.  Absent exigent circumstances, such as the
                 government threatening extreme action on a short timetable, a company should not refuse to grant
                 such a request for counsel.  However, as indicated earlier, companies should advise employees that
                 failure to cooperate timely – which includes fully submitting to interviews by Investigatory Counsel –
                 may result in adverse employment consequences, including dismissal.


                                Often, an unrepresented employee will ask just before or during an interview
                 whether she needs to consult counsel, or if she retains counsel, whether the company will pay for
                 such counsel.  Investigatory Counsel should be especially wary of this situation.  Under these
                 circumstances, Investigatory Counsel should remind the witness that counsel does not represent her
                 and that if she wishes to speak to her own counsel, the Investigatory Counsel would be willing to
                 adjourn the interview for a reasonable time to allow such consultation, and consider the company’s
                 indemnification of the employee’s costs of counsel and advancement of fees and expenses.  As
                 discussed above, advance preparation for such contingencies should include consultation with
                 the Independent Committee at the outset of the engagement regarding the scope of the company’s
                 obligations to indemnify and advance fees to categories of current and former directors, officers, and
                 employees.

                                The Independent Committee should also decide whether Investigatory Counsel will
                 make documents available to employees and their counsel for review before conducting interviews.
                 Absent special circumstances such as valid concerns of possible witness tampering, obstruction of
                 justice, other evidence of attempts to disrupt the integrity of the internal investigation, or an inability
                 in advance to retrieve and review voluminous documentation, Investigatory Counsel generally should
                 not interview witnesses before they have had a chance to review relevant documents, especially
                 emails and other communications the witness authored or received.  We caution Investigatory
                 Counsel against interviewing a witness who has not been given an adequate opportunity to refresh
                 his or her recollection as to prior events by reviewing key documents such as emails.  Investigatory
                 Counsel also should not succumb to pressure from prosecutors or regulators to interview such
                 witnesses before they have had a chance to review documents.  Such a premature interview could



                 71     See a discussion on employee indemnification and advancement of individual attorney’s fees in Section II. F. One event that can
                 trigger consideration of separate counsel for an employee is if the government asks to interview that employee.  Company counsel might
                 have a conflict advising the employee whether she “should” agree to such an interview.



                                                             19 
   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30