Page 34 - American College of Trial Lawyers Federal Criminal Procedure Committee 2020 Update: Recommended Practices for Companies and Their Counsel in Conducting Internal Investigations
P. 34

E.      FCPA and Other Bribery Issues


                               When carrying out internal investigations that involve the Foreign Corrupt Practices
                 Act (FCPA) or other bribery issues, multinational employers may find themselves investigating
                 alleged wrongdoing in more than one country.  In such cases, practitioners should be aware that in
                 2018 the Justice Department adjusted its approach to holding individuals and corporations responsible
                 for improper conduct under the FCPA.
                                                   106
                 VII.   Recommendations


                        A company should take steps to consider an internal investigation when significant corporate
                 malfeasance has been alleged or when an independent auditor gives notice that it suspects the
                 possibility of illegal corporate activity.  In reaching a decision on whether or to what extent an
                 internal investigation is in the best interests of the company and its shareholders, the Board of
                 Directors, audit committee, or special committee should – in  consultation with disinterested in-house
                 or outside counsel – weigh and consider published prosecutorial and regulatory policies, related
                 cases and dispositions, DOJ and/or SEC guidance, and the impact and costs to the company of an
                 investigation and of any potential follow-on litigation.  A Board, an audit committee, or a special
                 committee may, in select circumstances, after consultation with counsel, conclude that it is not in the
                 best interests of the company to conduct an internal investigation, or disclose to, or cooperate with,
                 the government if an investigation is undertaken.


                        When the alleged or suspected conduct implicates high-level, sensitive or serious misconduct,
                 or when the company itself is the focal point of a government inquiry, management, usually including
                 the general counsel’s office, should not be, and should not be perceived to be, in charge of or
                 otherwise exert any material influence over the internal investigation.

                        A committee of the Board of Directors consisting of independent members of the Board
                 (“Independent Committee”) should be delegated the task by the Board of overseeing the internal
                 investigation, including retaining counsel to conduct the investigation, when significant corporate
                 malfeasance has been alleged or when an independent auditor gives notice that it suspects the
                 possibility of illegal corporate activity.  The audit committee often constitutes the Independent
                 Committee.

                        The goal of the Independent Committee should be to seek to determine the truth of the
                 underlying allegations, to safeguard and act in the best interests of the shareholders, and to prevent
                 the internal investigation from impairing the reputations of employees, officers, and directors of the
                 company not found to have engaged in wrongdoing.


                        The Board of Directors should pass a resolution broadly authorizing the Independent
                 Committee to retain counsel and counsel’s experts and consultants, conduct an investigation, and
                 report its ultimate findings to the Board.






                 106    See supra, note 14.



                                                             28 
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39