Page 271 - Ranah Studi Agraria: Penguasaan Tanah dan Hubungan Agraris
P. 271

Ranah Studi Agraria

            sistance program to income earners in a wide range of sectors,
            are two good examples of a shift in government thinking. More-
            over, after showing rice wage stagnancy for the decade 1968/
            69–1977/78 (see Makali, 1978), micro studies now suggest

            real wages in the rice sector have risen over the past 5–6 years.
            One study tentatively suggests that labor shortages, may be
            quite widespread in Java, particularly in lowland areas close
            to major urban centers and at peak periods in the rice agricul-
            tural cycle (Collier, et al., 1983; see also Kasryno, 1983; Husein
            Sawit, Saefudin and Sri Hartoyo, 1984).
                The importance of non agricultural employment as a
            source of rural incomes in Java is by no means a very recent
            theme in the literature on the rural economy. White’s study of
            Kaliloro (Yogyakarta) in 1972/1973 showed that despite ex-
            traordinarily low returns per hour, households worked long
            hours in cottage industry (White, 1976). A series of surveys
            conducted by the Agro Economic Survey (SAE) 1976–1978
            in villages in West and East Java indicated that a wide range of
            non agricultural activities were a major source of employ-
            ment for both poor and better off households, although there
            were major interclass differences in the role which these ac-
            tivities played in the household economy: for poorer, land-

            less or near landless families the proportion of total income
            from nonfarm sources was relatively high despite large labor
            inputs and low returns per hour worked (especially, as White
            found, in cottage industry). On the other hand, among larger
            land owing families returns tended to be much higher but the
            contribution of non agricultural employment to total income
            was on average smaller than income from the rice sector

            202
   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276