Page 38 - ASME DSCC 2015 Program
P. 38

Technical Program





              ConTRIBuTED SESSIon                                    ConTRIBuTED SESSIon
              1-11-1  WP5  Robot Manipulators                        1-29-1  WP6  Automotive 1:  Engine Control
              Emerson Burkhart A                     4:00pm–6:00pm   Emerson Burkhart B                     4:00pm–6:00pm

              Session Chair: Ashish Deshpande, The University of Texas at Austin  Session Chair: Guoming Zhu, Michigan State University
              Session Co-Chair: Andy Zelenak, The University of Texas at Austin  Session Co-Chair: Mario Santillo, Ford Motor Company

              dynamic Balancing of parallel Manipulators Through reconfiguration  Adaptation for Air-Intake System Throttle Control in a Gasoline Engine
              Contributed regular paper. DSCC2015-9669               With low-Pressure Exhaust-Gas Recirculation
              Dan Zhang, Bin Wei, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa,   Contributed regular paper. DSCC2015-9657
              ON, Canada                                             Mario Santillo, Suzanne Wait, Julia Buckland, Ford Motor Company,
                                                                     Dearborn, MI, United States
              Dynamic Balancing of Parallel Manipulators Through Reconfiguration
                                                                     We investigate control strategies for traditional throttle-in-bore as well as
              The Advantages of Velocity Control for Reactive Robot Motion
                                                                     low-cost cartridge-style throttle bodies for the air-intake system (AIS) throttle
              Contributed regular paper. DSCC2015-9713
                                                                     used in low-pressure exhaust-gas recirculation (LPEGR) on a turbocharged
              Andy Zelenak, Clinton Peterson, Jack Thompson, Mitch Pryor, The   gasoline engine. Pressure sensors placed upstream and downstream of
              University of Texas at Austin, TX, United States
                                                                     the AIS throttle are available as signals from the vehicle’s engine control
              The Advantages of Velocity Control For Reactive Robot Motion  unit, however, we do not use high-bandwidth feedback control of the AIS
                                                                     throttle in order to maintain frequency separation from the higher-rate EGR
              A new Continuum Robot With Crossed Elastic Strips: Extensible
                                                                     loop, which uses the downstream pressure sensor for feedback control. A
              Sections With only one Actuator Per Section
                                                                     design-of-experiments conducted using a feed-forward lookup table-based
              Contributed regular paper. DSCC2015-9919
                                                                     AIS throttle control strategy exposes controller sensitivity to part-to-part
              Andria Remirez, Vanderbilt University Department of Mechanical   variations. For accurate tracking in the presence of these variations, we ex-
              Engineering, Nashville, TN, United States, Robert J Webster III, Vanderbilt
              University, Nashville, TN, United States               plore the use of adaptive feedback control. In particular, we use an algebraic
                                                                     model representing the throttle plate effective opening area to develop a
              We propose a new kind of continuum robot based on crossed elastic strips.   recursive least-squares (RLS)-based estimation routine. A low-pass filtered
              The actuator-specified location of the crossover point controls the lengths   version of the estimated model parameters is subsequently used in the
              of the sections, enabling a wider range of configurations than would be pos-  forward-path AIS throttle controller. Results are presented comparing the
              sible with traditional fixed-section-length robots. Push-pull actuation of the   RLS-based feedback algorithm with the feed-forward lookup table-based
              crossed strips controls the curvature of the sections. We provide a model   control strategy. RLS is able to adapt for part-to-part and change-over-time
              that describes the resulting configurations in terms of tangent circular arcs of   variabilities and exhibits an improved steady-state tracking response com-
              varying lengths. Experiments with a prototype yield tip positions that agree   pared to the feed-forward control strategy.
              with model predictions with an average error of 4.6% of the robot’s length.
                                                                     Control of a Base load and load-following Regulating organic
              Impulse Redirection of a Tethered Projectile           Rankine Cycle for Waste Heat Recovery in Heavy-Duty Diesel
              Contributed regular paper. DSCC2015-9708               Powertrain
              Hossein faraji, Ross Hatton, Stephanie Veile, Samantha Hemleben,   Contributed regular paper. DSCC2015-9707
              Pavel Zaytsev, Joel Wright, Hans luchsinger, Oregon State University,   David luong, Tsu-Chin Tsao, University of California, Los Angeles, Los
              Corvallis, OR, United States                           Angeles, CA, United States
              The momentum of a projectile in free flight can be redirected by using a   This paper examines a base loading organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) in a
              tether to create a ‘virtual wall’ against which it bounces. The direction of this   heavy-duty diesel powertrain. The ORC’s heat exchangers are modeled
              bounce can be controlled actively through braking modulation, or passively   as control-oriented, nonlinear Moving Boundary models. The pump and
              through placement of the tether anchor and the orientation of the projectile   expander, which are coupled to the engine crankshaft, have relatively faster
              at impact. In this paper, we explore the space of motions achievable through   dynamics the heat exchangers and are modeled as static components.
              the latter two methods. In particular, we consider the ways in which holding   The driving cycle produces transient heat source and engine conditions
              the tether away from center of mass at different angles can contribute to   for the ORC to maximize waste heat recovery under specified operating
              changes in speed and direction of motion after the bounce.  constraints. Constant low and high demand loads are given to the ORC’s
                                                                     expander to follow while regulating to pressure setpoints. The ORC is to
                                                                     maintain pressure setpoints through a pair of PI controllers and a third PI
                                                                     controller to follow the power demand. The results demonstrate pressure
                                                                     and base load power regulation to setpoints when the base load is feasible
                                                                     for constant and varying loads. When the base load power demand is infea-
                                                                     sibly too high, both pressure and power regulations contain steady-state
                                                                     error. In the considered scenarios, initial pressure transients violate
         38                                                          constraints and suggest the need for advanced controllers. The ORC
                                                                     improves the engine power efficiency by 0.5-2.5%.
   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43