Page 179 - From GMS to LTE
P. 179

Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS) and High-Speed Packet Access (HSPA)  165

               the timing advance is not possible. This is because while a mobile device is in soft handover
               state, all Node‐Bs of the Active Set receive the same data stream from the mobile device.
               The distance between the mobile device and each Node‐B is different though, and thus each
               Node‐B receives the data stream at a slightly different time. For the mobile device, it is not
               possible to control this by starting to send data earlier, as it only sends one data stream in the
               uplink direction for all Node‐Bs. Fortunately, it is not necessary to control the timing
               advance in UMTS as all active subscribers transmit simultaneously. As no timeslots are
               used, no collisions can occur between the different subscribers. To ensure the orthogonal
               nature of the channelization codes of the different subscribers it would be necessary, how-
               ever, to receive the data streams of all mobile devices synchronously. As this is not possible,
               an additional scrambling code is used for each subscriber, which is multiplied by the data
               that has already been treated with the channelization code. This decouples the different
               subscribers and thus a time difference in the arrival of the different signals can be tolerated.
                The time difference of the multiple copies of a user’s signal is very small compared to
               the length of a frame. While the transmission time of a frame is 10, 20, 40 or 80 milliseconds,
               the delay experienced on the air interface of several Node‐Bs is less than 0.1
                 milliseconds even if the distances vary by 30 km. Thus, the timing difference of the
               frames on the Iub interface is negligible.
                If a subscriber continues to move away from the cell in which the radio bearer was
               initially established, there will be a point at which not a single Node‐B of the S‐RNC is
               part of the transmission chain anymore. Figure 3.29 shows such a scenario. As this state
               is a waste of radio network resources, the S‐RNC can request a routing change from the
               MSC and the SGSN on the Iu(cs)/Iu(ps) interface. This procedure is called a Serving



               All user data is sent via two RNCs    After the SRNS relocation
               and the Iur interface                 only a single RNC is used


                       SGSN                                  SGSN

                        Iu(ps)
                                                                    Iu(ps)

                 RNC 1        RNC 2                    RNC 1        RNC 2
                         Iur                                   Iur

                                  Iub                                  Iub

               Node-B 1       Node-B 2   Node-B 3   Node-B 1       Node-B 2   Node-B 3










               Figure 3.29  SRNS relocation procedure.
   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184