Page 297 - Project+
P. 297

A Phased Delay

       A fellow project manager I know had an early project experience that involved a
       new system application that was being developed for customer care
       representatives from two recently merged companies. Although the requirements
       and all of the major deliverables referenced one system, each company had
       separate back-end systems that needed to interface with the new customer care

       system. Unfortunately, this piece of information was not discovered until the work
       of the project started. So, the development team had twice the application
       interface work to do than was originally planned.

       Everyone on the team knew there was no way that the project would be completed
       as scheduled. The development team provided a revised estimate that showed
       project completion six months later than the original schedule. Both the
       development manager and the project manager were afraid to go to the sponsor

       with this news, so they reported at the next project status meeting there would be a
       two-week delay and hoped for a miracle. Unfortunately, a miracle didn’t occur, so
       they reported there’d be another two-week delay. At this point, the sponsor started
       asking a lot of questions, and the project manager had to admit that the best
       estimates of the additional work indicated a six-month delay. The sponsor was
       furious that she had not been told the truth from the beginning, and it ruined the
       credibility of the project manager. In fact, a new project manager was named

       shortly after this incident.




     Key Performance Parameters

     Key performance parameters (KPPs) are similar to KPIs, only they are used to set
     operational goals or performance levels for systems. These are usually represented as
     the minimum acceptable levels or values for the system. KPPs are used primarily by
     government entities such as the Department of Defense and the U.S. Army in regard to
     military systems and equipment.



     Balanced Score Card

     A balanced score card is a strategic management tool used to measure the activities
     and processes a business uses to meet its strategic goals. It’s a way to determine
     whether the performance of the organization is measuring up to its goals. The balanced
     score card measures elements such as financial goals, business processes, innovation,
     the customer experience, and customer satisfaction. Typically, the balanced score card

     methodology focuses on strategic areas of the business and monitors a small number of
     important data elements. Balanced score card measures are usually communicated
     throughout the organization and, in my experience, are also tied to individual




                                                            297
   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302