Page 164 - Environment: The Science Behind the Stories
P. 164

1.4                               90%                                 FIguRE 2 Forest recovery was
                                            PSA program       80%                                 underway in Costa Rica before the
                            1.2             introduced        70%                                 PSA program began. Deforesta-
                          Deforestation rate (%/yr)  0.8    Percent forest cover  60%             steeply, indicating that other fac-
                            1.0
                                                                                                  tion rates (a) had already dropped
                                                              50%
                                                                                                  tors were responsible. Forest cover
                                                              40%
                            0.6
                                                                                                  (b) also began increasing shortly
                                                              30%
                                                                                                  before the program’s initiation (the
                            0.4
                            0.2
                                                                                                  from many studies). Data: From
                                                              10%
                                                                       introduced
                                                                                                  Daniels, Amy E., et al. 2010. Understand-
                            0.0                               20%      PSA program                graph gathers together estimates
                                                               0%
                                                                                                  ing the impacts of Costa Rica’s PES: Are
                            1960–79  1979–86  1986–97  1997–00  2000–05  1940  1950  1960  1970  1980  1990  2000  we asking the right questions? Ecological
                                                                                                  Economics 69: 2116–2126.
                                     Period of years                         Year
                         (a) Deforestation decreased       (b) Forest cover began increasing
                        Rodrigo Sierra and Eric Russman of   •  The PSA program was preceded by   Peninsula. They found that all seven
                        the University of Texas at Austin found   other policies that encouraged forest   approaches would improve on the
                        in 2006 that PSA farms had five times   cover (tax rebates and tax credits for   existing program. The best approach
                        more regrowing forest than did non-PSA   timber production, not ecosystem   paid some landowners more than
                        farms. Interviews with farmers indicated   services).                others while selecting sites based on
                        that the program was encouraging them   •  The creation of national parks fed a   the perceived value of their ecologi-
                        to let land grow back into forest if they   boom in ecotourism, so Costa Ricans   cal services and the apparent risk of
                        did not need it for immediate production.  were seeing how conserving natural   deforestation. This approach more
                            In the nation’s northern Carib-  areas could bring economic benefits.  than doubled the economic efficiency
                        bean plain, a team led by Wayde    •  Changing market prices for com-  of the program.
                        Morse of the University of Idaho used   modities discouraged ranching as   To determine how much money
                        a diversity of methods and analyses,   the price of meat fell.       to offer each landowner, Wünscher’s
                        combining on-the-ground interviews   •  After an economic crisis roiled Latin   team suggested using auctions, hav-
                        with satellite data, to produce the   America in the 1980s, Costa Rica’s   ing each applicant for PSA funds put
                        most thorough study of a region yet.   government ended subsidies for   in a bid stating how much they were
                        Their published summary in 2009      ranchers and farmers that had encour-  requesting. Because applicants have
                        found that PSA payments plus the     aged expansion into forested areas.  outnumbered available contracts 3 to
                        clearance ban had helped to reduce                                   1, FONAFIFO could favor the lower
                        deforestation rates from 1.43%/year   To help the PSA program        bids to keep costs low, while the
                        to 0.10%/year and that the program   make better use of its money, most   auction system could make differen-
                        encouraged forest regrowth still more.   researchers today feel that PSA pay-  tial payments politically acceptable.
                        Meanwhile, dissertation work by    ments should be targeted. Instead of   The Costa Rican government      CHAPTER 6 •  Ethi C s, E C ono mi C s,  A nd  s ustA in A bl E   dE v E lopm E nt
                        Rodrigo Arriagada indicated that the   paying equal amounts to anyone who   is responding to suggestions from
                        regeneration of new forest seemed to   applies, FONAFIFO should prioritize   researchers. It has begun aiming
                        be the PSA program’s major effect at   applicants, or pay more money, in   PSA payments toward regions of
                        the national level as well.        regions that are ecologically most   greater environmental value. To help
                            Most researchers today hold that   valuable or that are at greatest risk of   fight poverty, it has tried to make the
                        Costa Rica’s success in forest protection   deforestation.           program more accessible to small
                        results from a long history of conserva-  In a 2008 paper in the journal    low-income farmers in undeveloped
                        tion policies and economic develop-  Ecological Economics, Tobias    regions. In 2006, the government
                        ments. Indeed, deforestation rates had   Wünscher of Bonn, Germany, and   also raised the payment amounts
                        been dropping steeply before the PSA   colleagues modeled and tested seven   considerably. Researchers—and other
                        program was initiated (FIguRE 2). Major   possible ways to target the payments,   nations—will be watching closely to
                        reasons include the following:     using data from Costa Rica’s Nicoya   see how the program develops.



                                                                                                                                  163







           M06_WITH7428_05_SE_C06.indd   163                                                                                    12/12/14   2:57 PM
   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169