Page 171 - Essencials of Sociology
P. 171

144    CHAPTER 5                Social Groups and Formal Organizations

                                       not the wave of the future, most large companies have “diversity training” (Bennett
                                       2010). They hold lectures and workshops so that employees can learn to work with
                                       colleagues of diverse cultures and racial–ethnic backgrounds.
                                          Coors Brewery is a prime example. Coors went into a financial tailspin after one of
                                       the Coors brothers gave a racially charged speech in the 1980s. Today, Coors holds
                                       diversity workshops, sponsors gay dances, has paid for a corporate-wide mammography
                                       program, and has opposed an amendment to the Colorado constitution that would ban
                                       same-sex marriage. Coors has even sent a spokesperson to gay bars to promote its beer
                                       (Kim 2004). The company has also had rabbis certify its suds as kosher. Quite a change.
                                          Coors even adopted the slogan “Coors cares.” Cute, but this slogan does not mean
                                       that Coors cares about diversity. What Coors cares about is the same as other corpora-
                                       tions, the bottom line. Blatant racism and sexism once made no difference to profit-
                                       ability. Today, they do. To promote profitability, companies must promote diversity—or
                                       at least give the appearance of doing so. The sincerity of corporate leaders is not what’s
                                       important; diversity in the workplace is.
                                          Pepsi provides a good example of a positive, effective approach to diversity training.
                                       Managers are given the assignment of sponsoring a group of employees who are unlike
                                       themselves. Men sponsor women, African Americans sponsor whites, and so on. The
                                       executives are expected to try to understand the work situation from the perspective of
                                       the people they sponsor, to identify key talent, and to personally mentor at least three
                                       people in their group. Accountability is built in: The sponsors have to give updates to
                                       executives even higher up (Terhune 2005).
                                          Researchers have found that forcing workers to participate in diversity programs
                                       or doing the minimum to prevent lawsuits produces resentment. But setting goals for
                                       increasing diversity and making managers accountable for reaching these goals increase
                                       the diversity of a company’s workers.

                                       For Your Consideration
                                          Do you think that corporations and government agencies should offer diversity training?
                                        ↑
                                       Can you suggest practical ways to develop workplaces that overcome divisions of gender and
                                       race–ethnicity? ■



                                          Technology and the Control of Workers:
             Summarize major issues
        5.4
        in the technological control      Toward a Maximum-Security Society
        of workers. Explain how
        global competition is affecting   The microchip is affecting all areas of society. One of the most ominous is the greater
        corporations.                  potential to create a police state. It is now easier than ever before in history for governments
                                       to monitor our behavior, eventually our every move. The Big Brother (as in Orwell’s classic
                                       novel 1984) may turn out to be a master computer that makes servants of us all.
                                          We should know shortly. Computers now monitor millions of workers. In some
        group dynamics the ways in     workplaces, cameras even analyze workers’ facial expressions (Neil 2008). Other cameras
        which individuals affect groups and   outside the workplace, called “little brothers” (as compared with Orwell’s “Big Brother”),
        the ways in which groups influence   take video images of us as we walk on the street and shop in stores. As some analysts sug-
        individuals                    gest, we seem to be moving toward a maximum-security society (Marx 1995; Whitehead
                                       2010). With the surveillance of even our emails and telephone calls, this seems an apt term
                                       (Hopkins et al. 2013). As with the workers in the Sociology and the New Technology box
                                       on the next page, few of us realize how extensively we are being monitored.
        5.5 Be familiar with the effects
        of group size on stability, intimacy,
        attitudes, and behavior; types
        and styles of leaders; the Asch   Group Dynamics
        experiment on peer pressure; the
                                       Group dynamics is a fascinating area of sociology. This term refers to how groups influ-
        Milgram experiment on authority;
                                       ence us and how we influence groups. Most of the ways that groups influence us lie
        and the implications of groupthink.
                                       below our sense of awareness, however, so let’s see if we can bring some of this to the
   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176