Page 30 - Shot In The Dark Bullet Striations
P. 30

Put students into brainstorming groups. Give all    this role. This student must be very familiar with the
             groups five to ten minutes to develop hypotheses    laboratory procedures used to process the evidence
             for each of the following:                          and should also be aware of the ways the evidence
                                                                 can be mishandled and the precautions taken
             1.  Identify how each fact may support the case     against evidence contamination and faulty methods,
                 presented by the prosecution.                   as these are likely to come up in court.


             2.  Identify how each fact may support the case     The remainder of students should split,
                 presented by thedefense.                        approximately evenly, into the prosecution and
                                                                 defense teams. The student filling the role of the
             3.  Identify critical weaknesses in the reliability of   accused should work with the defense. Each side
                 each fact.                                      should assign their members as either lawyers
                                                                 or witnesses called. The lawyers are responsible
             Review the brainstorming results as a class and     for building their case, developing the questions
             instruct students to connect various facts and      to ask their witnesses, and for identifying key
             evidence to make logical assumptions about the case.  witnesses called by the other side to exploit during
                                                                 cross examination. Each side should also identify
                                                                 critical weaknesses in their own case and prepare
             STUDENT ROLES                                       counter-arguments for these weaknesses. As there
             Allow students to select, or assign, various roles   are always surprises during trial, each side should
             relative to the characters.                         prepare strategies to deal with the unexpected.


             Additional students may serve as the court, filling   The prosecution must provide a reasonable series
             the roles of judge, bailiff, and clerk. The judge must   of events that are consistent with the facts of
             research court proceedings and make determinations   the case, a motive for the events that occurred,
             of law, therefore the instructor may wish to take this   and prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the
             role themselves. The bailiff is responsible for swearing   accused is guilty. The defense may present
             in witnesses and keeping order in the court. The Clerk   their own accounting of the facts or undermine
             is responsible for recording the trial proceedings. You   the prosecution’s case by showing that the
             may wish to omit these roles or have these students   prosecution’s witnesses are unreliable, that the
             work with the prosecution or defense during the     prosecution’s version of the events make no sense
             planning stages. With large classes, students may   or is inconsistent, or by introducing reasonable
             also play the role of jury. Jurors must attend to the   doubt into the prosecution’s case.
             trial proceedings and also review the evidence and
             written documents prepared by the defense and       Unlike a real trial, witnesses may help the lawyers
             prosecution to come to a conclusion about the case.   build their case; their primary duty, however,
             They must then either meet outside of class and     should be to become intimately familiar with their
             come to a unanimous decision, or each write a short   testimony. Expert witnesses are especially useful
             paper justifying their own decision.                when dealing with forensic evidence, and each side
                                                                 may wish to call their own or use the other side’s
             At least one student should act as an expect witness   expert. The students playing the role of expert
             (the forensic scientist who processed analyzed      witness must become very familiar with that field
             the evidence presented); if multiple laboratory     and be able to field questions about the accuracy
             modules were utilized, several students should fill   and limitations of the techniques.






              30    THE MYSTERY OF LYLE AND LOUISE
   25   26   27   28   29   30   31